AI Rate Professor

Chemistry

M. Sushinsky

CHEM151 · CHEM115 · CHEM201 · CHEM105 · 22 lifetime ratings

AI rating
91/100
RMP rating
4.6/5
Take again
81.82%
Difficulty
2.7

The decision

if you want a and are willing to keep up with consistent work.

Best fit · Effort For RewardCaring chemistry teacherClear exam preparationExtra credit availableWork-heavy but manageableStrong lectures
  • Students overwhelmingly praise her clarity, care, and willingness to help.
  • Chemistry , and exam preparation.
  • Grades are reachable because she offers review materials, curves, , and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

82/100

An A is very reachable with steady work because , and provides strong review materials.

, while the single online review also reports an A but regular weekly work.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

68/100

Chemistry content is not inherently easy, but and review materials .

In-person students most often say she makes chemistry understandable, while the online review focuses more on workload than concept difficulty.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

45/100

because lectures, worksheets, labs, and and exams.

In-person reviews most clearly show attendance matters, while online evidence .

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

92/100

Students strongly recommend her because , and fair for a difficult subject.

, and the one online review is also positive.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

78/100

She is not a free grader, but curves, , dropped work, and .

Format shift

, while the online review confirms an A with consistent work.

Workload

Moderate

55/100

The , and exams, but most students call it manageable when spread out.

Format shift

The online review stresses weekly workload, while structure.

Teaching experience

Excellent

93/100

Most students describe her as , and unusually effective at teaching chemistry.

Format shift

, and the online review also says she is helpful.

Assessment method

Balanced

65/100

Grades appear , and finals, with exams carrying major weight.

Format shift

In-person reviews provide detailed assessment evidence, while the , and homework.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

21 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews are strongly positive, with , and manageable work if students study.

Main concern

Chemistry is still fast-paced and .

What students said

“ and didn't get mad if you asked a lot of questions.”
CHEM151
“The so I suggest studying but she curved most .”
CHEM151

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

The single online review says the class has regular worksheets, labs, and homework, but she gives warnings and helps students.

Main concern

Work can pile up if students wait until the deadline.

What students said

“In a typical and homework.”
CHEM201
“Whenever the class had a question she was always happy to help.”
CHEM201

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams are important and can be difficult, but , and .

MidtermsFinal ExamQuizzesExam ReviewsCurved Exams

Assessment risk

Standard

68/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, exam reviews, sample exams, and some curving, but do not clearly prove book or proctoring rules.

MidtermsFinal ExamQuizzesExam ReviewsCurved Exams
“there's 4 midterms, and .”
CHEM151
“ .”
CHEM151
“she provides you with a .”
CHEM151

Online

The online review does not clearly prove exam format, proctoring, webcam, Lockdown Browser, open-book policy, midterm format, or .

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Everyone should be able to excel in the course, as long as they put in the work and ask for .”

Voice snapshots generated from 22 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and exams. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

93/100

“Her lectures were always easy to understand and you could tell she wanted everyone to succeed.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

92/100

“But seriously, if you need to take Chem 151, take her!”

⚖️

78/100

“ .”

Theme 1

👩‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • she was able to convey material so well
  • and if you have any questions she will answer them.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Not an easy class but if you put time aside for it, it's good.
  • She also offers !
  • The if you do not come prepared.

Theme 3

🧪

  • there's 4 midterms, and .
  • In a typical and homework.
  • she provides you with a .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

22

Recent reviews read by the AI

22

Lifetime ratings

90/100

Evidence confidence

Twenty-two reviews across many years show a consistent pattern of , and manageable but real workload.

Inside 22 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 517
4 out of 52
3 out of 51
2 out of 52
1 out of 50

Course coverage

CHEM15117 reviews
CHEM2013 reviews
CHEM1051 review
CHEM1151 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

20 reported outcomes

A range

12

A+ 2 · A 9 · A- 1

B range

8

B+ 3 · B 3 · B- 2

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values