Kimberly Haglund

ENGLISH101 · ENG101 · ENG271 · ENGLISH090 · ENGLISH271 · ENG103 · 32 lifetime ratings

AI rating: 39/100
RMP rating: 3.1/5
Take again: 56%
Difficulty: 3.0

The decision

if and can handle inconsistent communication and organization.

Best fit · Self Taught ProInconsistent communicationTough essay gradingDisorganized course managementPaper-heavy workloadHelpful when engaged

Reviews are sharply split between caring, helpful instruction and , and communication.
The class can produce high grades, but students often report stress from , and AI-detection disputes.
Online reviews are especially risky because several students describe disappearing, slow replies, technical issues, and Turnitin AI problems.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

52/100

High grades are possible, but , and paper volume make the A feel unreliable.

Online evidence is more volatile and includes AI-detection complaints, while and strict paper grading.

Is the course easy?

Standard

45/100

The content is not conceptually extreme, but writing expectations, vague directions, and .

Online sections show more confusion from organization and communication, while and fast pacing.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

55/100

Reviews do not clearly establish a , though participation and class engagement matter in several sections.

, so the flexibility judgment is based on limited participation comments.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

45/100

Recommendation depends heavily and , because student experiences range from excellent to disastrous.

Online reviews include the strongest avoid warnings, while and severe organization complaints.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

32/100

Many students describe tough essay grading, Turnitin AI penalties, and being marked down for .

Format shift

Online grading complaints are harsher because of AI detection, while and .

Workload

Heavy

30/100

The course is paper-driven with frequent essays, reading, drafts, discussions, and in some cases overloaded short-term work.

Format shift

Online short-term sections and ENG271 are described as especially heavy, while .

Teaching experience

Poor

42/100

Some students find her caring and helpful, but repeated reports of disappearing, rude replies, vague directions, and .

Format shift

Online reviews show more severe communication failures, while and poor classroom organization.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

18/100

Assessments are , and projects rather than exams.

Format shift

Both formats are assignment-heavy, with online sections especially focused on essays and discussions.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

13 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews are also mixed, with some students praising improvement and care while others report rude behavior, poor organization, and .

Main concern

The main concern is strict or .

What students said

“Horrible Professor, she's very consistently rude and has an attitude problem, as well as marks you down on things she did not teach you.”
ENG103

“She grades fairly and offers a lot of and even allows you to revise your essays at the end for extra credit.”
ENG101

“She is a very paper-driven professor.”
ENG103

Remote format

Online

19 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews are polarized, with some easy A reports but many serious complaints about AI detection, , and .

Main concern

The main concern is unreliable communication and .

What students said

“her Turnitin AI detection will mark you as AI-generated.”
ENG101

“Disappeared for 5 weeks (yes!) and .”
ENG103

“Take Haglund for eng 103 online!”
ENG103

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

because reviews explicitly say some sections have no exams and describe assessment mainly through essays and discussions.

No ExamsEssays And DiscussionsPaper-Based Assessment

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

82/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

exam policy, though one review says class information was almost always on tests.

Tests Mentioned In One SectionNo Clear Proctoring Evidence

“the information is almost always on the tests.”
ENG103

Online

Online reviews explicitly mention no exams in one ENG101 section and otherwise describe essays, discussions, and papers rather than proctored tests.

No ExamsEssays And DiscussionsNo Clear Proctoring Evidence

“ and discussions.”
ENG101

“Normally she lets you turn in your rough draft and .”
ENG101

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice
“Disappeared for 5 weeks (yes!) and .”
Voice snapshots generated from 32 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and organization. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

42/100

“She clearly cares deeply for her students and for the content she teaches.”

⚠️ Communication Risk

30/100

“When you try to show proof of your , so forget about it.”

📝 Assignment Load

30/100

“She is a very paper-driven professor.”

Theme 1

📬 About Communication

.
Had to reach out multiple times to get questions answered which gave me stress as the deadlines for the assignments approached.
Took forever to grade stuff!!!

Theme 2

📈 About Grades And Essays

She grades fairly and offers a lot of and even allows you to revise your essays at the end for extra credit.
She's strict with papers but it's understandable why.
.

Theme 3

🧭 About Organization

and you have no idea what is going on.
Gave wrong syllabus at start, assignments & dates for another semester.
Just be wary that so if you struggle without organization you may have trouble.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

Recent reviews read by the AI

Lifetime ratings

90/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is high because 32 reviews span many years and show , and communication.

Inside 32 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 511

4 out of 56

3 out of 51

2 out of 54

1 out of 510

Course coverage

ENG10315 reviews

ENG10110 reviews

ENG2712 reviews

150951 review

911 review

Show 3 more courses

ENGLISH0901 review

ENGLISH1011 review

ENGLISH2711 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

24 reported outcomes

A range

A+ 8 · A 5

B range

B 2 · B- 1

C range

C 1

D range

D- 1

F

No reported values

No letter grade reported

Drop/Withdrawal 2 · Not sure yet 3 · Not_Sure_Yet 1

Kimberly Haglund

x x x if x x x x x x and can handle inconsistent communication and organization.

Four answers before you build your schedule.

FairEffort

Standard

Varies

Depends

See how this professor fits your week.

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

In person

Online

See what students actually said.

🎯 Teaching Quality

⚠️ Communication Risk

📝 Assignment Load

📬 About Communication

📈 About Grades And Essays

🧭 About Organization

See exactly what the AI read.

Quality ratings

Course coverage

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

A range

B range

C range

D range

F

No letter grade reported

if and can handle inconsistent communication and organization.