AI Rate Professor

Nursing

Benyta Maradkel

Courses not reported · 9 lifetime ratings

AI rating
96/100
RMP rating
4.6/5
Take again
90%
Difficulty
2.3

The decision

if you want a and pushes real nursing growth.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerClinical MentorCaring InstructorStrong FeedbackCritical Thinking FocusMostly Supportive
  • Most students praise her as a and real nursing judgment.
  • and pushes students to think critically rather than just complete tasks.
  • One review reports accessibility and professionalism concerns, so the experience is not perfectly risk-free.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

82/100

High grades are common and students report support, but clinical performance still requires engagement and critical thinking.

because there are no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

70/100

Clinical work can be demanding, but she , and practical explanations.

All course .

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

45/100

Reviews , but participation and presence matter in the clinical setting.

Only in-person clinical reviews mention participation, and there is .

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

90/100

because , and helps build clinical confidence.

Recommendation evidence is entirely in person, with one negative review offset by many very positive ones.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

78/100

Grades are mostly A-range and , though one tag calls her a .

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

64/100

Reviews focus on clinical learning and but active work.

Format shift

Only in-person reviews exist, and they do not describe a heavy workload pattern.

Teaching experience

Excellent

92/100

Students overwhelmingly describe her as knowledgeable, caring, patient, and effective at developing clinical judgment.

Format shift

Teaching evidence is entirely in person and mostly excellent, with .

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

30/100

Reviews center , and skill development rather than formal exams.

Format shift

All .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

10 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

All evidence is in person, and most reviews strongly , and nursing knowledge.

Main concern

A minority concern is that .

What students said

“ , and always encouraged us to ask questions and think critically.”
130
“By far, the so far in terms of feedback.”
124
“ and would change conferences often.”
124

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove an , so and participation evidence.

No Clear Exam EvidenceClinical FeedbackParticipation Matters

Assessment risk

Varies

60/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, finals, open-book rules, closed-book rules, or proctoring.

No Clear Exam EvidenceClinical FeedbackParticipation Matters
“By far, the so far in terms of feedback.”
124
“She helps engage her students in both critical thinking and clinical judgement.”
050

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ , and always encouraged us to ask questions and think critically.”

Voice snapshots generated from 10 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and concerns. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

92/100

“She taught us so many little things that we never learned in class but are very important in real nursing practice.”

💬

88/100

“By far, the so far in terms of feedback.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

90/100

“ as your mentor!”

Theme 1

👩‍⚕️ About Clinical Teaching

  • She helped me a lot and made my clinical make sense everything
  • She helps engage her students in both critical thinking and clinical judgement.
  • She helped me a lot during clinical and gave me great advice on how to improve in my skills.

Theme 2

💬

  • , and caring!
  • , and clearly explained any concepts I did not understand.
  • Great Professor. and understanding.

Theme 3

⚠️ About Concerns

  • and would change conferences often.
  • .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

10

Recent reviews read by the AI

9

Lifetime ratings

80/100

Evidence confidence

The 10 reviews are recent and detailed but limited to in-person clinical contexts with one strong negative outlier.

Inside 10 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 59
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

0504 reviews
1303 reviews
1242 reviews
2301 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

8 reported outcomes

A range

7

A+ 4 · A 3

B range

1

B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values