AI Rate Professor

Health Science

Howard Fisher

PHYSED127 · HCSI100 · PE101 · PE100 · HLHSC100 · PE · BSKTBALL · PHYSED · HEALT100 · HLTH100 · KPET209 · HLHS100 · HLTHSCI100 · HEALTH100 · 32 lifetime ratings

AI rating
68/100
RMP rating
3.7/5
Take again
66.67%
Difficulty
2.0

The decision

Take him for a generally manageable health or PE requirement if you can follow instructions carefully and .

Best fit · Effort For RewardEasy health classStrict discussionsMixed personalityOnline-friendly examsAttendance matters
  • Many students call the class easy when they follow the work and use the notes or book.
  • A major negative pattern is strict or and participation.
  • Older in-person reviews are highly mixed, while online reviews include both easy-A praise and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

78/100

Many students report easy tests and A-level outcomes, but .

Online reviews lean easier overall, while in-person reviews are more polarized and include stricter participation complaints.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

74/100

Health and PE content is often described as easy, though some students found quizzes, tests, or discussion standards unexpectedly demanding.

Both formats often describe easy content, but online KPET and some in-person health reviews report tougher grading expectations.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

52/100

Attendance appears important in several in-person classes, while online reviews focus more on deadlines and discussion work.

In-person reviews mention being on time and attending class, while online reviews do not show a .

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

66/100

and clear, but disliked by those who experience him as harsh or unhelpful.

Online recommendations are mostly positive except KPET 209, while in-person recommendations are more mixed.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

55/100

but strict on discussion boards, participation, and late or timed quiz rules.

Format shift

, while in-person comments include both easy tests and strict standards.

Workload

Light

78/100

Most reviews describe few assignments, discussion boards, quizzes, tests, or short papers rather than heavy ongoing work.

Format shift

Online reviews often call the workload light, and in-person reviews also and effort are consistent.

Teaching experience

Good

70/100

, and knowledgeable, but a substantial minority describe him as rude, arrogant, or unclear.

Format shift

Online teaching is praised for , while in-person tone and personality receive more mixed reactions.

Assessment method

Balanced

58/100

Assessment includes quizzes, tests, discussion boards, papers, participation, and occasional finals.

Format shift

Online reviews mention quizzes, exams, discussions, and papers; in-person , and papers.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

26 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews range from very easy and enjoyable to strongly negative about personality, clarity, and strict standards.

Main concern

Student experience varies sharply by course and expectations around effort, attendance, and discussions.

What students said

“Very easy work and .”
HLTH100
“impossible to please and has no leeway.”
HCSI100
“make sure that are at class evry day and ON TIME.”
HLTH100

Remote format

Online

6 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Easy A Hunter

Online reviews usually describe an easy class with manageable exams, but KPET 209 and .

Main concern

Discussion posts and course difficulty suggests.

What students said

“Easy A.”
HLTHSCI100
“ .”
HLHSC100
“He will dock .”
KPET209

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exam evidence suggests mostly standard or manageable tests and use, Lockdown Browser, or open-book rules for current online reviews.

Multiple Choice QuizzesTimed ExamsDiscussion BoardsBook-Supported Online Work

Assessment risk

Standard

67/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews mention tests, quizzes, and online-style book use in some comments, but do not clearly prove a consistent in-person exam policy.

TestsQuizzesAttendance-Tied Quizzes
“Very easy work and .”
HLTH100
“Does not give credit to quizes 1 sec over time allowed.”
HLHS100

Online

Online reviews mention multiple-choice timed exams and easy quizzes, but do not clearly prove proctoring, webcam, Lockdown Browser, or open-book rules.

Multiple Choice QuizzesTimed Exams
“ .”
HLHSC100
“Quizes are multiple choice, matching and truefalse.”
HLTHSCI100

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“It is a great class and easy as long as you do the work:)”

Voice snapshots generated from 32 reviews, highlighting workload, grading, personality, and format differences. Credibility rating: High.

👍 Recommendation Pattern

66/100

“ .”

📈 Easy Course Value

78/100

“It is a great class and easy as long as you do the work:)”

⚖️

55/100

“He will dock .”

Theme 1

📚

  • .
  • Very easy work and .
  • There and due dates were not too close together

Theme 2

⚖️

  • impossible to please and has no leeway.
  • He will dock .
  • Does not give credit to quizes 1 sec over time allowed.

Theme 3

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Great teacher, he knows what he is teaching about.
  • He is rude.
  • .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

32

Recent reviews read by the AI

32

Lifetime ratings

86/100

Evidence confidence

There are 32 reviews across many years and courses, with enough detail to show both easy-course patterns and recurring strictness concerns.

Inside 32 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 518
4 out of 53
3 out of 52
2 out of 54
1 out of 55

Course coverage

HLHSC1005 reviews
HLTH1005 reviews
HEALTH1003 reviews
HLTHSCI1003 reviews
HCSI1002 reviews
Show 9 more courses
HEALT1002 reviews
HLHS1002 reviews
KPET2092 reviews
PE2 reviews
PE1002 reviews
BSKTBALL1 review
PE1011 review
PHYSED1 review
PHYSED1271 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

10 reported outcomes

A range

6

A+ 2 · A 4

B range

2

B+ 1 · B 1

C range

1

C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not sure yet 1