AI Rate Professor

Biology

Melania Abrahamian

BIO201 · BIOSCI201 · BIOSCI48411 · ENVT220F2 · 11 lifetime ratings

AI rating
58/100
RMP rating
3.6/5
Take again
63.64%
Difficulty
3.7

The decision

Take her if you can stay organized and use , but if you need clear structure.

Best fit · Effort For RewardExtra credit availableMixed organizationResponsive to questionsHeavy labs and examsProctorio concerns
  • directions, responsiveness, and manageable passing paths.
  • Online reviews report confusing modules, , and .
  • appears often, but students still describe meaningful workload and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

58/100

and flexible grading help, but students still need to keep up with labs, reading, homework, and .

In-person evidence suggests a clearer path to passing, while and .

Is the course easy?

Standard

45/100

The content is , but anatomy and lab material can become difficult when modules or .

Online reviews describe the content as more convoluted, while effort.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

55/100

, though one online review says there were no Zoom classes or .

Online evidence includes no real attendance for one course, while attendance policy.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

60/100

and she is responsive, but several warn strongly against confusing online sections.

In-person students are mostly positive, while online students are split or negative.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

58/100

and some flexibility help grades, but point deductions and tough-grader complaints .

Format shift

Online reviews mention tougher deductions, while and .

Workload

Moderate

42/100

Workload can be manageable, but labs, reading, papers, and .

Format shift

Online reviews report more homework and long study guides, while and course setup.

Teaching experience

Average

62/100

She is responsive and helpful in several reviews, but and weak teaching clarity.

Format shift

In-person teaching feedback is stronger, while and exam preparation.

Assessment method

Balanced

58/100

Reviews mention labs, , and exams, so assessment is mixed rather than purely exam-based.

Format shift

Online reviews emphasize tests and written work, while , and exams.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

7 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews are more favorable, with and she answers questions quickly, though workload and .

Main concern

Some in-person students still report messy resources, high expectations, and Proctorio use.

What students said

“Everything is straight to the point.”
BIOSCI201
“Gives you all the information to be able to pass you just have to put in the work and study.”
BIO201

Remote format

Online

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online students describe helpful responsiveness and , but also confusing modules, heavy work, and .

Main concern

and hard-to-target exams.

What students said

“ .”
BIOSCI201
“The because you do not know what to focus on.”
BIOSCI201

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

because reviews mention online exams, Proctorio, hard-to-target tests, and short-answer or essay formats.

Online ExamsProctorioShort Answer ExamsPractical ExamsUnclear Exam Focus

Assessment risk

Strict

35/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and Proctorio use, but do not clearly prove whether exams are open-book or closed-book.

Online ExamsProctorio
“All of the .”
ENVT220F2
“Be aware uses Proctorio.”
BIOSCI48411

Online

Online reviews describe difficult tests, practicals with unlabeled images, and short-answer or essay exams, but do not clearly prove webcam or .

Short Answer ExamsPractical ExamsUnclear Exam Focus
“No MC, .”
BIOSCI201
“The because you do not know what to focus on.”
BIOSCI201

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Gives you all the information to be able to pass you just have to put in the work and study.”

Voice snapshots generated from 11 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and exams; credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

62/100

“ .”

⚖️

58/100

“She is flexible with .”

🧪

35/100

“The because you do not know what to focus on.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Everything is straight to the point.
  • .
  • Answers questions quickly.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Just follow the and you will be fine.
  • The only way you would struggle is if .

Theme 3

📝

  • 3 labs due same day for only 20 points.
  • No MC, .
  • Be aware uses Proctorio.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

11

Recent reviews read by the AI

11

Lifetime ratings

82/100

Evidence confidence

Eleven reviews across several years give consistent enough evidence, though format differences are important.

Inside 11 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 54
4 out of 52
3 out of 52
2 out of 52
1 out of 51

Course coverage

BIO2015 reviews
BIOSCI2014 reviews
BIOSCI484111 review
ENVT220F21 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

9 reported outcomes

A range

5

A+ 1 · A 4

B range

3

B 3

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Audit/No Grade 1