AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Julianna Yankey

MATH140H · MATH140 · MATH075 · 19 lifetime ratings

AI rating
20/100
RMP rating
1.6/5
Take again
5.26%
Difficulty
3.6

The decision

Avoid unless you are comfortable teaching yourself statistics and only need a manageable path through the class.

Best fit · Self Taught ProConfusing LecturesSelf Teaching RequiredTextbook ReadingHeavy HomeworkNot Recommended
  • Most students say lectures add little because she reads from the textbook and gets sidetracked.
  • Grades can be manageable if students teach themselves with outside videos or the textbook.
  • Attendance is often described as low value, but .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

55/100

Several students earned A grades, but most say the A depends on self-teaching, outside videos, and staying on top of assignments.

Online evidence includes one easy-content A story, while as self-teaching through poor lectures.

Is the course easy?

Standard

52/100

Statistics is often described as not inherently hard, but needed.

Online reviews more directly call the content easy, while difficulty.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

45/100

Some students say lecture is not worth attending, but and .

Online evidence suggests class attendance may be avoidable, while .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

15/100

because they feel they learn little and must teach themselves.

Both formats are negative, but and intense about avoiding the professor.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

48/100

Grades can be achievable, but , and delayed grading keep the grading experience from feeling lenient.

Format shift

Online reviews mention tough grading and slow grading, while .

Workload

Heavy

28/100

Reviews mention lots of homework, reading, projects, and .

Format shift

In-person reviews provide stronger workload evidence, while but focus more on teaching problems.

Teaching experience

Awful

25/100

The dominant pattern is textbook , and students needing to self-teach.

Format shift

Both formats criticize teaching, with .

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

80/100

Students repeatedly , and homework, with exams carrying strong attention in comments.

Format shift

and pop quizzes, while online reviews provide less assessment detail.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

14 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person reviews are harsher, repeatedly , and not worth attending for learning.

Main concern

Lectures are described as confusing and low value.

What students said

“I had to .”
MATH140H
“ , so don't skip class.”
MATH075

Remote format

Online

5 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online students also report , slow communication, and reliance on outside materials, though one review says the content itself was easy.

Main concern

and may get little timely help.

What students said

“The class itself is easy but it's hard because of how badly she teaches.”
MATH140H
“It takes her two months to grade 1 single assignment.”
MATH140

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mention several tests and exams but do not clearly prove open-book, proctoring, webcam, Lockdown Browser, or closed-book rules.

Multiple ExamsTests Manageable If Self-TaughtProjects Mentioned

Assessment risk

Standard

45/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and multiple exams but do not clearly prove closed-book or proctoring rules.

Multiple ExamsProjectsTests Manageable If Self-Taught
“ if you teach yourself otherwise you are screwed.”
MATH140H
“There are 2 projects and 5 exams so good luck”
MATH140H

Online

Online reviews mention tests but do not clearly prove proctoring, webcam, open-book, Lockdown Browser, or .

Tests Mentioned
“ and in the class.”
MATH140H

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ unless you are prepared to teach yourself.”

Voice snapshots generated from 19 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and recommendation. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

25/100

“Great lady, terrible lecturer.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

15/100

“ the WORST.”

📚 Self Teaching

55/100

“Watch the Matt Teachout videos and you'll be fine.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She reads straight from the textbook, so lecture's don't add anything you can't read over for yourself.
  • Her lectures aren't focused and she often gets sidetracked very easily.
  • She doesn't really teach..

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • The work is manageable, and as long as you use the textbook or videos, you'll be fine.
  • if you teach yourself otherwise you are screwed.
  • Quite a few students in my class ended up with an A.

Theme 3

⚠️ About Student Experience

  • No office hours.
  • Doesnt answer back emails, , and youd be better off teaching the class yourself
  • !

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

19

Recent reviews read by the AI

19

Lifetime ratings

88/100

Evidence confidence

Nineteen reviews across several years show a highly consistent pattern of weak teaching, self-teaching, and low recommendation.

Inside 19 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 52
2 out of 54
1 out of 512

Course coverage

MATH140H10 reviews
MATH1405 reviews
MATH0754 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

16 reported outcomes

A range

8

A+ 1 · A 7

B range

3

B+ 1 · B 2

C range

1

C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

4

Audit/No Grade 1 · Not sure yet 3