Renee Hall

CAWT116 · CIT145 · CAWT145 · CIT140 · CIT036 · QUICKBOOKSPRO · CIT100 · CIT116 · 35 lifetime ratings

AI rating: 71/100
RMP rating: 4.2/5
Take again: 76.92%
Difficulty: 2.5

The decision

Take Renee Hall if you want a helpful professor and can tolerate heavy assignment volume, especially in online or short-session courses.

Best fit · Effort For RewardHelpfulLots of HomeworkGroup ProjectsClear GradingCaring

Hall is often praised as helpful, caring, funny, and .
CAWT116 online and short-session reviews repeatedly warn about heavy, tedious workload.
Students can earn strong grades, but the A often requires keeping up with and group projects.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

68/100

High grades are common, but many students say the A requires steady completion of many assignments and group projects.

In person reviews more often describe an easy A, while online reviews warn that heavy workload makes the A time-consuming.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

70/100

The material is often called easy or straightforward, but some QuickBooks and MindTap work is tedious or .

Online content is described as easy but repetitive, while in person classes feel easier because Hall helps students through the work.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

72/100

, and some students note they can catch up or complete work outside class.

Online evidence focuses , while in person reviews suggest class time is useful but not always strictly required.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

76/100

and caring, but workload complaints prevent a stronger recommendation.

In , while online reviews are split because of , and grading concerns.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

55/100

Grades are often high, but several students call her nit-picky, tough, or not an .

Format shift

Online reviews contain most strict-grading complaints, while in person .

Workload

Heavy

28/100

Many reviews mention weekly assignment piles, MindTap work, and .

Format shift

Online CAWT116 and short sessions show the heaviest workload, while in person workload is lighter or partly completed during class.

Teaching experience

Good

82/100

Hall is widely described as helpful, caring, funny, and accessible, though some online CAWT116 students report poor learning value.

Format shift

In person teaching is consistently praised, while online teaching has sharper criticism tied to workload and assignment design.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

35/100

Course grades appear driven mostly by homework, MindTap, projects, writing exercises, quizzes, and group work rather than major exams.

Format shift

Online reviews emphasize MindTap assignments and group projects, while in person reviews emphasize assignments completed with help in class.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

23 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

In person reviews are much more positive, , and support.

Main concern

Some in person .

What students said

“This professor is a must-take!”
CIT145

“She went above and beyond to help with assignments.”
CAWT145

“ , and obviously wants her students to succeed.”
CIT145

Remote format

Online

12 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

many students earn high grades, but , and grading complaints are common.

Main concern

The online workload can feel tedious and overwhelming, especially in winter or summer sessions.

What students said

“10-15 brain-dead assignments a week.”
CAWT116

“It's an easy class, the workload is just unnecessarily heavy in my opinion.”
CAWT116

“She will make you work for that A or B and .”
CIT116

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exam comments are limited but generally student-friendly, with , and one old book-use report.

Practice TestsTests Not ProctoredBook Allowed In One ReviewQuizzes

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

78/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In person reviews mention exams and one book-use test policy, but do not clearly prove current proctoring, closed-book policy, .

Book Allowed In One ReviewPractice Based WorkExams Mentioned

“She brought us pizzas and .”
CIT145

“She lets you use the book for your tests.”
CIT145

Online

Online reviews explicitly mention unproctored tests, practice-test overlap, and quizzes, but do not clearly prove .

Tests Not ProctoredPractice TestsQuizzes

“The .”
CAWT116

“the to do the because those questions are literally in the test.”
CIT116

“There is as well as some quizzes.”
CIT116

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice
“ , and obviously wants her students to succeed.”
Voice snapshots generated from 35 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and format differences; credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

82/100

“She is by far the most helpful and accessible professor I've had.”

⚖️ Workload Reality

28/100

“Every Sunday, there were 20+ assignments due.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

76/100

“ if you're willing to put in the effort.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

She is such a sweet soul.
She went above and beyond to help with assignments.
and beyond to make sure you learn.

Theme 2

📚 About Workload

10-15 brain-dead assignments a week.
Every Sunday, there were 20+ assignments due.
and very tedious, about 6-8 (possibly more) assignments due every Sunday.

Theme 3

📈 About Grades & Effort

She will make you work for that A or B and .
Easy class just follow the book and you will pass the class with an easy A.
Not an but you can get most of .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

Recent reviews read by the AI

Lifetime ratings

91/100

Evidence confidence

Thirty-five reviews across many years and both formats provide rich evidence, though older in person reviews may overrepresent earlier course designs.

Inside 35 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 524

4 out of 54

3 out of 52

2 out of 52

1 out of 53

Course coverage

CAWT11610 reviews

CIT1459 reviews

CAWT1457 reviews

CIT1403 reviews

CIT1002 reviews

Show 3 more courses

CIT1162 reviews

CIT0361 review

QUICKBOOKSPRO1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

24 reported outcomes

A range

A+ 3 · A 12 · A- 4

B range

B+ 2 · B 1 · B- 1

C range

No reported values

D range

No reported values

F

No reported values

No letter grade reported

Not sure yet 1