AI Rate Professor

Political Science

Deems Morrione

PLSCI150 · POLI290 · POLISC150 · POLI230 · POLSC230 · POLIS230 · POLI150 · POLISCI230 · POL230 · COS126 · POLISCI290 · POLSC290 · POLISCI150 · 100 lifetime ratings

AI rating
80/100
RMP rating
4.4/5
Take again
76.74%
Difficulty
3.5

The decision

Take him if you want an engaging but demanding political science class and , and .

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerEngaging LecturerHeavy ReadingTough GraderOpinionated DiscussionsNote-Driven Success
  • Students consistently praise his funny, memorable lectures and deep political knowledge.
  • Grades often depend on papers, essays, or a few major tasks, with strict or .
  • , and accept a challenging lecture style usually do well.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

62/100

An A is realistic for prepared students, but it , and adapting to his grading expectations.

Online evidence , while in-person evidence more often says effort and notes lead to success.

Is the course easy?

Standard

48/100

The course content is intellectually demanding because readings, theory, and lecture-heavy material require focus.

Online students call some material manageable, but and challenging ideas.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

42/100

as formally mandatory, but many reviews say lecture notes are essential to passing.

, while online evidence focuses more on watching lectures and taking notes.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

78/100

and knowledge, though a minority strongly object to bias and grading.

, while online reviews contain more sharp negative reactions.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

46/100

, but many students say and notes are strong.

Format shift

Online , while in-person reviews describe tough but sometimes fair grading.

Workload

Moderate

52/100

The workload is usually reading-heavy with constant small tasks.

Format shift

Online reviews mention fewer but , while , and note-taking.

Teaching experience

Good

82/100

His strongest pattern is lively, funny, knowledgeable lecturing, despite recurring complaints about bias and .

Format shift

, while online feedback is more polarized.

Assessment method

Balanced

54/100

Assessment , and essay-style work rather than frequent quizzes.

Format shift

Both formats point to writing-heavy assessment, with and exams.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

42 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person reviews are mostly positive, especially for engaging lectures, but many warn that , and .

Main concern

notes, and write well to succeed.

What students said

“ on assignments and tells you what you need to do to get a better grade.”
POLI290
“I really enjoyed Professor Morriones class. He gives amazing lectures.”
PLSCI150

Remote format

Online

8 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Online reviews are mixed, with some praising engaging lectures and , and strict criteria.

Main concern

Online and political bias.

What students said

“Engaging lectures and .”
POLI290
“The material itself was manageable and I probably would have learned a lot if .”
PLSCI150

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exam evidence varies by course, with , and paper-style finals reported.

Open Note TestsTake-Home EssaysPaper-Based FinalTwo Exams

Assessment risk

Varies

65/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

papers, and a paper-style final in different courses.

Open Note TestsTake-Home EssaysPaper-Based Final
“If class, especially since tests are open note.”
PLSCI150
“The paper.”
POLI290

Online

Online reviews do not clearly prove webcam, proctoring, Lockdown Browser, open-book, midterm, or .

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ if you want to be challenged! His passion manifests into a class that will stretch your brain and reframe your worldview.”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and discussion style. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

82/100

“ .”

⚖️

46/100

“He is a .”

📚 Workload Reality

52/100

“There is a lot of .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • His lectures were always very engaging, he gave a schedule ahead of time and didnt .
  • Probably the funniest Professor I have ever had.
  • LECTURE, LECTURE, LECTURE...

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • You have to work to do well, but ask questions and reach out, you will be fine.
  • , and I tried my absolute best but could not earn an A.
  • He is a so make sure you actually put in the work.

Theme 3

💬

  • Any disagreement with him about the course material is treated as .
  • He gets upset when there are views different than his own.
  • Great class discussion.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

100

Lifetime ratings

92/100

Evidence confidence

The analysis is based on 50 reviews across many years, with , and formats.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 570
4 out of 518
3 out of 56
2 out of 51
1 out of 56

Course coverage

POLI29011 reviews
PLSCI1509 reviews
POLI1504 reviews
POLI2304 reviews
POLIS2304 reviews
Show 8 more courses
POLISC1504 reviews
POLISCI1504 reviews
POLSC2903 reviews
POL2302 reviews
POLISCI2902 reviews
COS1261 review
POLISCI2301 review
POLSC2301 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

43 reported outcomes

A range

20

A+ 2 · A 17 · A- 1

B range

16

B+ 5 · B 10 · B- 1

C range

2

C 2

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

5

Drop/Withdrawal 1 · Incomplete 2 · Not sure yet 2