AI Rate Professor

Chemistry

David Feiler

CHEM151 · 11 lifetime ratings

AI rating
87/100
RMP rating
4.0/5
Take again
81.82%
Difficulty
2.6

The decision

if you want a fair chemistry path with and can handle test-heavy structure plus some self-study.

Best fit · Effort For RewardGenerous CurvesCheat Sheets AllowedMonotone LecturesTest HeavySelf-Study Helpful
  • Students repeatedly say his grading is generous, with , and manageable labs.
  • Chemistry remains test-heavy, so supported by practice materials.
  • Teaching is helpful but sometimes monotone, making independent study useful for some students.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

84/100

An A is very reachable because allowed in some sections, and labs are graded gently.

, while online evidence is more mixed but still includes a smooth-success review.

Is the course easy?

Standard

55/100

Chemistry itself is still difficult, but his study guides, practice exams, and .

Online and as manageable when students use lectures and study materials.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

48/100

Attendance and lecture , but , and online videos are important.

Online evidence stresses watching videos, while , and office hours.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

82/100

Students generally recommend him because he is caring, accessible, and .

In-person reviews are more consistently positive, while the small online .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Generous

90/100

Curves, cheat sheets, dropped scores, completion-based labs, and .

Format shift

, while online evidence also supports easy passing but notes weak feedback.

Workload

Moderate

62/100

Homework and labs are manageable, but chemistry study and .

Format shift

Online reviews emphasize lecture videos and study guides, while , and .

Teaching experience

Good

76/100

He is helpful and caring, but repeated comments about monotone or boring lectures lower the teaching score.

Format shift

Both formats mention boring or monotone lectures, while during labs.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

82/100

, though , and practice exams also matter.

Format shift

In-person reviews repeatedly call exams a huge portion of the grade, while and .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

9 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews are mostly positive, , and manageable chemistry exams.

Main concern

The main issue is monotone lectures and a grade .

What students said

“ and allow you to use ALL 4 of your cheat sheets for the final.”
CHEM151
“ .”
CHEM151

Remote format

Online

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews are split between a smooth, supported hybrid experience and complaints about boring lectures and .

Main concern

Online students may need to stay disciplined with lecture videos and .

What students said

“ in class, fill out the study guides, and easily pass the class.”
CHEM151
“David Feiler had pretty boring lectures, and went over simple concepts for too long in comparison to more difficult ones.”
CHEM151

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams are important but student-friendly because , and an open-note online final.

Cheat Sheets AllowedCurved ExamsOpen Note FinalPractice ExamsTest Heavy

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

88/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, practice exams, note cards, and an open-note online final in at least one section.

Cheat Sheets AllowedCurved ExamsPractice ExamsOpen Note Final
“He allows students to bring cheat sheets for exams, and even then still adds a curve!”
CHEM151
“ and online, and there was a study session before.”
CHEM151

Online

Online reviews mention study guides and but do not clearly prove webcam, proctoring, Lockdown Browser, or .

Study GuidesCanvas Lab Grading
“fill out the study guides, and easily pass the class.”
CHEM151
“Part of the on canvas.”
CHEM151

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Professor Feiler is incredibly generous. He allows students to bring cheat sheets for exams, and even then still adds a curve!”

Voice snapshots generated from 11 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and workload. Credibility rating: High.

⚖️

90/100

“ and allow you to use ALL 4 of your cheat sheets for the final.”

🎯 Teaching Quality

76/100

“Professor Feiler was great. He was easy to keep up with and explained things well.”

🧪

82/100

“ so beware and study for them.”

Theme 1

📈

  • and grades based on completion for labs.
  • You can easily get an A.
  • and you can have a note card, but underestimate them and you might pay for it.

Theme 2

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • He was a little monotoned, but he got more passionate as the semester went on.
  • He was easy to keep up with and explained things well.
  • David Feiler had pretty boring lectures, and went over simple concepts for too long in comparison to more difficult ones.

Theme 3

🧾 About Workload & Support

  • The to do and he allowed a full page of paper front and back to be used as a cheat.
  • if you had any questions.
  • The and the .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

11

Recent reviews read by the AI

11

Lifetime ratings

78/100

Evidence confidence

The 11 reviews are recent enough and detailed, with , and lecture style.

Inside 11 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 55
4 out of 52
3 out of 53
2 out of 51
1 out of 50

Course coverage

CHEM15111 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

11 reported outcomes

A range

7

A+ 1 · A 6

B range

3

B+ 1 · B 2

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Rather not say 1