AI Rate Professor

Architecture

Cesia Lopez-Angel

ARCHT120 · 4 lifetime ratings

AI rating
47/100
RMP rating
3.5/5
Take again
50%
Difficulty
2.8

The decision

if and independently manage creative drafting work.

Best fit · Self Taught ProConfusing instructionsMiscommunicationCreative projectsMaterials requiredMixed experience
  • Reviews and positive creative project experiences.
  • Grades look high, but comments do not prove the class is effortless for everyone.
  • All available evidence is online, so .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

65/100

Grades are high and , but and required materials raise the effort cost.

All evidence comes from online reviews, with .

Is the course easy?

Standard

58/100

The projects may be simple, but .

Only online reviews exist, and they conflict between self-explanatory objectives and serious confusion.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

Reviews .

Only online reviews exist, and .

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

48/100

Recommendation depends on whether a and work independently.

Online reviews are evenly split between strong praise and strong dissatisfaction, with no in-person evidence.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

60/100

High reported grades suggest passing is manageable, but one review marks her as a and the sample is small.

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

62/100

Projects are described as simple, but required drafting materials and .

Format shift

Online reviews mention simple projects and needed materials, with no in-person comparison.

Teaching experience

Poor

42/100

Teaching quality is inconsistent, with serious complaints about unclear instructions balancing a few positive comments.

Format shift

Only online reviews are available, and they are divided.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

25/100

Comments emphasize projects, objectives, materials, and drafting work rather than exams.

Format shift

Online reviews support an .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Remote format

Online

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews are mixed, with two students praising simple creative projects and and miscommunication.

Main concern

Communication and .

What students said

“The and when you ask for clarification she changes the subject.”
ARCHT-120
“Too much miscommunication.”
ARCHT-120
“The and you do not need to over think them.”
ARCHT-120

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove any exam format, proctoring policy, open-book rule, or .

Assessment risk

Standard

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Online

Online reviews do not clearly prove the .

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Too much miscommunication.”

Voice snapshots generated from 4 reviews, highlighting , and materials. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

42/100

“The and when you ask for clarification she changes the subject.”

👍 Recommendation Level

48/100

“ .”

📐 Project Simplicity

62/100

“The and you do not need to over think them.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Clarity

  • The and when you ask for clarification she changes the subject.
  • Too much miscommunication.

Theme 2

🎨 About Projects

  • A great class to express your creativity.
  • The and you do not need to over think them.

Theme 3

🧰 About Materials

  • You need materials and a drafting board to be good.
  • The objectives are layed out and self explanatory.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

4

Recent reviews read by the AI

4

Lifetime ratings

38/100

Evidence confidence

Only 4 online reviews are available, and the comments are highly split with .

Inside 4 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 52
1 out of 50

Course coverage

ARCHT-1204 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

3 reported outcomes

A range

3

A+ 1 · A 2

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values