AI Rate Professor

Health Science

Robert Dos Remedios

KPET200 · 1 lifetime ratings

AI rating
40/100
RMP rating
3.0/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

Consider him only if and busy work in a simple online class.

Best fit · Self Taught ProUnclear gradingBusy workKnowledgeableExtra creditSimple requirements
  • The only review says he knows the material but is just alright as a professor.
  • The class can be simple if students meet requirements and do the work.
  • and unnecessary busy work are the main problems.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

62/100

The student earned an A and says the class is simple if you meet requirements, but busy work and .

All evidence comes from one online review, with no in-person evidence.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

64/100

The course content sounds simple, but the and busy work make it less smooth.

Only the online format has evidence, so no format comparison is possible.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

The review .

The only , and there are no in-person reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

35/100

The student suggests trying to get a better professor because of and unnecessary busy work.

The recommendation evidence comes only from one online review.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

35/100

The and a tough grader tag despite an A outcome.

Format shift

, and there is no in-person evidence.

Workload

Moderate

45/100

The class is called simple, but unnecessary busy work keeps the workload from feeling light.

Format shift

Only online workload evidence exists, and there is no in-person evidence.

Teaching experience

Average

50/100

He is knowledgeable, but the student describes him as only alright and .

Format shift

Only online teaching evidence exists, and there is no in-person evidence.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

25/100

The , and busy work rather than exams.

Format shift

Only online assessment evidence exists, and there is no in-person evidence.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

The online review describes a simple course with and unnecessary busy work.

Main concern

The .

What students said

“ for some students”
KPET-200
“he gives unnecessary busy work”
KPET-200

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

The review does not clearly prove the .

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Online

The online review does not clearly prove webcam, proctoring, Lockdown .

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ for some students”

Voice snapshots generated from 1 review, highlighting key themes in , and workload. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

50/100

“Professor Remedios knows what he is talking about and is an alright professor.”

⚖️

35/100

“ for some students”

📚 Workload Value

45/100

“he gives unnecessary busy work”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Professor Remedios knows what he is talking about and is an alright professor.
  • if you can try to get a better professor because he gives unnecessary busy work.

Theme 2

📈 About Grades & Work

  • for some students
  • the class is simple meet the requirements and do the work

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

1

Recent reviews read by the AI

1

Lifetime ratings

28/100

Evidence confidence

, so the evidence is current but too thin for strong confidence.

Inside 1 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 51
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

KPET-2001 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values