AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Iveta Toneryan

MATH103 · MATH70 · MATH60 · MATH070 · MATH125 · 21 lifetime ratings

AI rating
48/100
RMP rating
3.1/5
Take again
52.38%
Difficulty
3.6

The decision

Take her if you are willing to practice consistently and ask for help, but if you need flexible pacing or .

Best fit · Effort For RewardLecture HeavyTest HeavyPatient When AskedHeavy HomeworkTough Grading
  • Students and lecture-heavy classes that are hard to digest.
  • Grades and tests, so one bad score can hurt badly.
  • , and asking questions outside class.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

38/100

An A is possible, but students repeatedly , and strong test performance with few grade buffers.

Online evidence is mixed, while and required practice.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

36/100

The math content is often manageable when explained patiently, but many students find the lecture pace and .

Online reviews mention clearer delivery but planning problems, while and .

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

25/100

Reviews repeatedly warn that missing class or not being present for released work can seriously hurt performance.

Online flexibility appears weak in one review because work was released during class, and .

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

50/100

but warn that lecture-heavy teaching and few graded items make the class risky.

Both formats are split, with online especially polarized because there are only two reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

30/100

Grades often rely on few tests and quizzes, and several students call her a .

Format shift

, while one online review also reports zero credit without shown work.

Workload

Heavy

28/100

Many students mention lots of , and substantial practice needed outside class.

Format shift

The heavy workload pattern is strongest in .

Teaching experience

Average

52/100

She is often described as patient and helpful, but many students also find lectures dry, fast, or poorly explained.

Format shift

Online evidence includes one very positive and one very negative review, while reviews.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

82/100

Students repeatedly say , and the final.

Format shift

, while online evidence mentions assignments or tests released during class.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

19 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

but lecture-heavy math instructor whose tests and grading structure can be unforgiving.

Main concern

Grades are and .

What students said

“Her lectures are mostly just a copy and paste of whats on the textbook.”
MATH103
“60% Chapter Exams, 25% Final.”
MATH070

Remote format

Online

2 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

support and another reporting random timed releases and harsh work requirements.

Main concern

around.

What students said

“conveys material clearly, teaching .”
MATH103
“ and exclusively get released randomly during class for that 1 hour.”
MATH103

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

grading opportunities, but they do not clearly prove proctoring, webcam, open-book, or closed-book rules.

Test HeavyFew Graded ItemsQuizzes And ExamsNo Clear Proctoring Evidence

Assessment risk

Strict

34/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and a final, but do not clearly prove open-book, closed-book, or proctoring rules.

Quizzes And TestsChapter ExamsFinal ExamFew Graded Items
“your grades are based only off of quizzes and tests”
MATH103
“60% Chapter Exams, 25% Final.”
MATH070

Online

Online reviews mention timed class releases and work-showing requirements, but do not clearly prove webcam, proctoring, Lockdown Browser, open-book, midterm, or .

Random Timed ReleasesShow Work Required
“No work shown equals a 0.”
MATH103
“exclusively get released randomly during class for that 1 hour.”
MATH103

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“She is a great teacher for anyone willing to learn.”

Voice snapshots generated from 21 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and workload. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

52/100

“She was willing to work through problems and invited questions but .”

⚖️

30/100

“does not give and quizzes so if your doing bad halfway through the ”

📚 Workload

28/100

“Assigns a lot of homework and her lectures were really heavy and hard to digest.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Her lectures were structured and straightforward.
  • Her lectures are mostly just a copy and paste of whats on the textbook.
  • lectures very heavy but well explained.

Theme 2

📈 About Grades And Tests

  • your grades are based only off of quizzes and tests
  • 60% of .
  • if you learn the material.

Theme 3

❤️ About Helpfulness

  • , and she is very helpful.
  • Iveta helped too
  • She happily answers any questions

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

21

Recent reviews read by the AI

21

Lifetime ratings

86/100

Evidence confidence

The analysis is based on 21 reviews across many years with detailed and , and support.

Inside 21 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 55
4 out of 53
3 out of 53
2 out of 58
1 out of 52

Course coverage

MATH1039 reviews
MATH706 reviews
MATH0704 reviews
MATH1251 review
MATH601 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

14 reported outcomes

A range

3

A 2 · A- 1

B range

5

B+ 1 · B 3 · B- 1

C range

1

C+ 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

5

Drop/Withdrawal 3 · Not sure yet 2