AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Julio Herrera

STATISTICS140 · MATH212 · MATH103 · MATH102 · MATH70 · STATS140 · MATH140 · MATH125 · MATH75 · MATH104 · 38 lifetime ratings

AI rating
27/100
RMP rating
2.5/5
Take again
22.22%
Difficulty
3.7

The decision

unless you are strong in , and can handle unclear lectures and demanding tests.

Best fit · Self Taught ProConfusing lecturesHeavy workloadTough gradingSelf-teaching riskOccasionally caring
  • Many students say and they had to teach themselves.
  • Workload and as heavy, long, or stressful.
  • A minority report lenient grading, , and genuine support.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

36/100

Some students earned As , but most describe heavy homework, tough tests, and stressful grading.

The online evidence points to unsupported self-teaching, while reports but many hard-work warnings.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

31/100

Math and statistics content often becomes harder because students say the textbook.

Online reviews describe self-teaching, while and difficult tests.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

42/100

as formally mandatory, but several reviews say skipping class makes passing much harder.

Online reviews do not clarify attendance policy, while .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

28/100

Most students do not recommend him because , and support is inconsistent.

Both online reviews are strongly negative, while but are still mostly cautionary.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

30/100

as tough or picky, though some students report curves, , and partial credit.

Format shift

Online reviews give little grading detail, while exceptions.

Workload

Heavy

25/100

Students frequently mention lots of homework, lecture-heavy classes, weekly quizzes, and .

Format shift

Online workload is unclear beyond stress, while and tests.

Teaching experience

Poor

32/100

Many students say he is nice or caring, but the and students needing to teach themselves.

Format shift

Online teaching is described as unsupported, while positive experiences.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

78/100

, and grades based on few major items.

Format shift

Online assessment details are limited, while in-person , and finals.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

36 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person reviews are mixed but lean negative, with , and heavy homework.

Main concern

Students often say explanations make math harder and .

What students said

“ .”
MATH140
“The tests were so difficult.”
MATH103
“He grades very leniently and will give you many opportunities to help your grade!”
MATH140

Remote format

Online

2 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews are very negative and focus on poor course setup, no response, and self-teaching.

Main concern

Students report little support and major stress in the online format.

What students said

“be prepared to go through this course self-teaching math 102.”
MATH102
“I reached out to him multiple times addressing these issues and .”
STATISTICS140

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

to very long, difficult, and strictly graded exams.

Take-Home ExamsTextbook-Based QuestionsTough TestsLong ExamsPartial Credit

Assessment risk

Varies

43/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews describe exams based on homework or textbook problems, but also long and .

Take-Home ExamsTextbook-Based QuestionsTough TestsLong Exams
“Most people passed because of .”
MATH140
“ textbook problems)”
MATH212
“ and we had so many problems on an exam”
MATH103

Online

Online reviews do not clearly prove the final format.

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“You might as well teach yourself the subject.”

Voice snapshots generated from 38 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and format differences; credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

32/100

“You might as well teach yourself the subject.”

⚖️

30/100

“He is a and he does not provide his students with enough time to finish the tests.”

👍 Recommendation Risk

28/100

“ .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • .
  • .
  • He helped with all the questions I had and .

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • The tests were so difficult.
  • He grades very leniently and will give you many opportunities to help your grade!
  • but I felt there was a lot of complaints.

Theme 3

🧠 About Student Fit

  • This is a very hard subject for many people, it doesn't help that you have to teach yourself in his class
  • if stats comes at ease for you and you are brilliant at the subject.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

38

Recent reviews read by the AI

38

Lifetime ratings

88/100

Evidence confidence

The analysis is based on 38 reviews across many years, with , and mixed grading.

Inside 38 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 55
4 out of 59
3 out of 53
2 out of 57
1 out of 514

Course coverage

MATH14010 reviews
MATH706 reviews
MATH2125 reviews
STATISTICS1405 reviews
MATH1033 reviews
Show 6 more courses
1402 reviews
MATH1022 reviews
STATS1402 reviews
MATH1041 review
MATH1251 review
MATH751 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

23 reported outcomes

A range

7

A+ 2 · A 4 · A- 1

B range

10

B+ 3 · B 7

C range

1

C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

5

Audit/No Grade 1 · Drop/Withdrawal 2 · Not sure yet 2