AI Rate Professor

Economics

. Boosoo

MACROECON · ECON202 · ECON201 · 7 lifetime ratings

AI rating
80/100
RMP rating
3.6/5
Take again
50%
Difficulty
2.4

The decision

He looks good for , and want , but the recent online review signals strict deadline risk.

Best fit · Easy A HunterExtra credit heavyExam predictableFunny lecturerOlder mixed evidenceStrict online deadline
  • Older , and a funny but sometimes accented lecturer.
  • The single recent online review is sharply negative about being dropped after a missed deadline.
  • Recommendation is split because the strongest positives are old and the newest evidence is negative.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

82/100

In-person students repeatedly say an A is easy with , and .

, while the single online review suggests strict deadline risk instead.

Is the course easy?

Standard

58/100

The professor makes exams manageable, but economics itself is described as a hard topic and lectures require attention.

In-person reviews say the course is manageable with notes, while the .

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

55/100

, but students say going to class and taking notes is the path to an easy A.

, while online evidence only shows a strict assignment deadline.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

58/100

, but the only recent online review is a severe negative experience.

, while online recommendation is unsupported and negative.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

78/100

, and old-test advantage make grading look forgiving in in-person classes.

Format shift

, while the online review suggests strict deadline enforcement.

Workload

Light

78/100

Students describe short homework, notes-based studying, and rather than heavy sustained workload.

Format shift

In-person workload sounds light, while online workload is unclear except for a missed assignment deadline.

Teaching experience

Good

72/100

, and , though one older review is lukewarm and the online review is negative.

Format shift

but old, while the only online review reports a poor experience.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

82/100

Comments focus heavily on exams, study guides, old tests, notes, and .

Format shift

, while online evidence only mentions one assignment deadline.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

6 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Easy A Hunter

In-person reviews are mostly positive and , and doing well is easy with notes.

Main concern

Some students mention a heavy accent and the subject itself can still be hard.

What students said

“Go to class and A.”
ECON202
“Follow the study guide and .”
ECON201

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

The only online review is very negative and reports being dropped after missing a 5 pm assignment deadline.

Main concern

Strict deadline enforcement may create high risk online.

What students said

“Dropped me because I did not turn in an assignment due at 5:00 pm....I had a family emergency.”
MACROECON

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

as predictable and easy with notes or study guides, but online exam policy is not clearly proven.

Study Guide Based ExamsEasy ExamsExtra CreditOld Tests Helpful

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

80/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

follow notes, study guides, or old tests.

Study Guide Based ExamsEasy ExamsOld Tests Helpful
“Follow the study guide and .”
ECON201
“if you have the .”
MACROECON

Online

The online review does not clearly prove quiz format, exam format, proctoring, webcam use, Lockdown Browser, or open-book rules.

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Go to class and A.”

Voice snapshots generated from 7 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and format differences. Credibility rating: Medium.

📈 Easy A Path

82/100

“Go to class and A.”

🎯 Teaching Quality

72/100

“Great Professor! He lets you know exactly what will be on the exams and offers several opportunities.”

⚠️ Online Risk

35/100

“Dropped me because I did not turn in an assignment due at 5:00 pm....I had a family emergency.”

Theme 1

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Follow the study guide and .
  • fun, have an accent, no eassy required, really easy test just study the notes, and lots of
  • if you have the .

Theme 2

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Great Professor! He lets you know exactly what will be on the exams and offers several opportunities.
  • funny man. good teacher. very understanding. good class.
  • weird teacher. has a heavy accent but is pretty funny.

Theme 3

⚠️ About Online Experience

  • Dropped me because I did not turn in an assignment due at 5:00 pm....I had a family emergency.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

7

Recent reviews read by the AI

7

Lifetime ratings

55/100

Evidence confidence

There are seven reviews, but most positives are very old and the only recent review is a negative online outlier.

Inside 7 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 53
4 out of 52
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 51

Course coverage

ECON2014 reviews
MACROECON2 reviews
ECON2021 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Drop/Withdrawal 1