AI Rate Professor

Accounting

Daniel Friedman

BUS101 · BUS202 · 15 lifetime ratings

AI rating
100/100
RMP rating
4.9/5
Take again
100%
Difficulty
2.1

The decision

if you want a supportive, organized accounting professor who rewards steady work with strong outcomes.

Best fit · Effort For RewardExcellent LecturerHighly OrganizedCaring and HelpfulFair GraderHomework Heavy
  • Students overwhelmingly praise his clear videos, organization, humor, and support.
  • , but students say his structure makes the material manageable.
  • Grades are consistently strong when , and study.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

88/100

Getting an A is realistic with , and studying, helped by fair grading and strong guidance.

Most evidence is online, while .

Is the course easy?

Beginner

74/100

Accounting is described as heavy and sometimes fast paced, but and organization make it feel much easier.

Online reviews give the clearest evidence of structured videos and modules, while .

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

65/100

Reviews do not clearly prove a , though one in-person tag says participation matters.

Online reviews focus on asynchronous materials, while .

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

98/100

Students almost unanimously recommend him because , and fair.

Both online and online evidence.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

84/100

Students describe grading as fair or lenient, with late work and a .

Format shift

Online reviews provide the strongest evidence of fair grading, while .

Workload

Moderate

58/100

The workload is manageable but not light, with repeated mentions of lots of homework in BUS202.

Format shift

Homework concerns come mostly from online BUS202 reviews, while .

Teaching experience

Excellent

98/100

Students consistently praise his clear lectures, organization, humor, examples, accessibility, and care for student success.

Format shift

Online reviews give extensive teaching evidence, and in-person reviews also rate him as organized and highly recommendable.

Assessment method

Balanced

62/100

, and exams, suggesting a mix of assignments and exams.

Format shift

Online reviews mention homework and tests most clearly, while .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews are also very positive, emphasizing organization, accessibility, leniency, and strong recommendation.

Main concern

The , so details are limited.

What students said

“This professor was really good all semester and was super lenient, would definitely recommend no .”
BUS202
“ and the professor was easy to get in contact with.”
BUS202

Remote format

Online

13 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Online reviews are extremely positive, with , and fair grading.

Main concern

Some online sections have lots of homework and a fast pace.

What students said

“ and give a .”
BUS202
“There is quite a bit of , but the as hard and they match the material covered very well.”
BUS202

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams appear standard and preparation-based, with proctoring.

Exams Match Covered MaterialTests Not Too Hard If PreparedLong TestsTest Heavy

Assessment risk

Standard

68/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews only tag the course as test heavy and do .

Test Heavy
“This professor was really good all semester and was super lenient, would definitely recommend no .”
BUS202

Online

and , but they do not clearly prove webcam, proctoring, Lockdown Browser, or open-book policy.

Exams Match Covered MaterialTests Not Too Hard If PreparedLong Tests
“ if you've watched his lectures and done the homework.”
BUS202
“ but if you study you wont use all the time.”
BUS202

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“One of the . He makes every lecture very interesting and relates everything back to real world experiences and that .”

Voice snapshots generated from 15 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and support. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

98/100

“His lectures are thorough and VERY well done.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

98/100

“ if you want a good grade and knowledge in accounting.”

⚖️

84/100

“He responded to questions and emails promptly and was fair in .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • and offers SEVERAL examples in his lectures to help students better understand the material.
  • Everything you need to know is in his video lectures.
  • He makes every lecture very interesting and relates everything back to real world experiences and that .

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • Accounting is a heavy course but with professor Friedman you feel the course extremely easy.
  • There is quite a bit of , but the as hard and they match the material covered very well.
  • Do the work and .

Theme 3

❤️ About Support

  • Professor Friedman really wants his students to succeed.
  • Professor Friedman is the .
  • He is always willing to spend extra time to help if you need it.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

15

Recent reviews read by the AI

15

Lifetime ratings

92/100

Evidence confidence

Fifteen reviews across several years are detailed, consistent, and strongly aligned in praising his teaching and fairness.

Inside 15 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 514
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

BUS20213 reviews
BUS1012 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

15 reported outcomes

A range

11

A+ 3 · A 7 · A- 1

B range

2

B 2

C range

1

C+ 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not sure yet 1