AI Rate Professor

Business

Kim Gundlach

PARALEGAL106 · PARLG111 · PARLG112 · PARLG101 · PARLGL108 · BUS132 · PARALEGAL101 · PARLG107 · PARA101 · 17 lifetime ratings

AI rating
25/100
RMP rating
2.7/5
Take again
27.27%
Difficulty
2.8

The decision

Avoid Kim Gundlach unless you are comfortable self-teaching, strict deadlines, and textbook-heavy classes.

Best fit · Self Taught ProSelf-Teaching RequiredMonotone LecturesStrict DeadlinesTough GraderTextbook Heavy
  • Student opinion is sharply negative overall, with , and self-teaching.
  • Grades can be manageable in some classes if students show up, read, and , but grading and deadlines are often described as rigid.
  • Online reviews are especially polarized and deadline-focused, while and lack of structure.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

55/100

An A or B is possible with , and studying, but , and confusing instruction make it unreliable.

Online evidence shows stricter deadline risk, while tests if students show up and study.

Is the course easy?

Standard

50/100

The material is not always intellectually hard, but , and self-teaching make the course feel harder than it should.

Online reviews emphasize deadline and , while and weak structure.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

18/100

Several reviews warn that showing up matters and missing class or deadlines can seriously hurt the grade.

Online reviews mention missed class and deadline penalties, while up.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

30/100

Most students do not recommend her because they , and a need to self-teach.

Online and reviews harsher about deadlines and in-person reviews harsher about teaching clarity.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

28/100

Grading is strict because many reviews , and deadline penalties.

Format shift

Online reviews show the strictest grading and deadline complaints, while .

Workload

Heavy

36/100

Workload feels heavy because students mention lots of , and self-teaching.

Format shift

Online workload centers on deadlines and assignments, while , and unclear class work.

Teaching experience

Poor

32/100

Teaching quality is poor overall because many students describe her as , and .

Format shift

Online reviews are mixed but include severe complaints, while and structure.

Assessment method

Balanced

58/100

Assessment , and exams rather than one dominant method.

Format shift

Online reviews mention quizzes, discussions, deadlines, and assignments, while in-person , and exams.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

12 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person reviews repeatedly describe monotone lectures, weak structure, self-teaching, and , though some students find the class passable with regular work.

Main concern

Students often feel they must teach themselves because lectures and .

What students said

“ ...”
PARLG111
“She provides little to no direction, 75% of the class has no idea what we're doing during in class assignments.”
PARLG111

Remote format

Online

5 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews are highly mixed but lean negative, with strong complaints , and boring or .

Main concern

Strict deadlines and .

What students said

“Deadlines are very random and strict.”
PARLG107
“You miss a .”
PARLGL108

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exam evidence is mixed, with and others saying quizzes and exams are easy with study.

Textbook-Based QuizzesHard ExamsEasy Exams With StudyStrict Deadlines

Assessment risk

Varies

45/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews conflict, with some describing hard or and others saying exams are easy if students study slides and homework.

Hard ExamsEasy Exams With Study
“ because the questions sometimes didn't makes sense.”
PARALEGAL106
“ as long as you study the , and just put in regular work.”
PARLG101

Online

Online reviews mention textbook-based quizzes and strict deadlines, but do not .

Textbook-Based QuizzesStrict Deadlines
“ ”
PARLGL108
“Deadlines are very random and strict.”
PARLG107

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ ...”

Voice snapshots generated from 17 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and self-teaching. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

32/100

“I left .”

⚖️

28/100

“Deadlines are very random and strict.”

📘 Course Effort

55/100

“Easy A or B if you come to every class. Do the home work and the .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She provides little to no direction, 75% of the class has no idea what we're doing during in class assignments.
  • Her monotone voice makes class a bit tough to follow
  • Professor Gundlach is clearly knowledgeable and wants to teach, but does not do anything outside of the textbook.

Theme 2

📈 About Grades & Deadlines

  • You miss a .
  • Shes cool. Just show up and shes a but easy overall.
  • nice.

Theme 3

🧠 About Self-Teaching

  • .
  • Many times you are left to figure things out by researching how to do it
  • ...

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

17

Recent reviews read by the AI

17

Lifetime ratings

86/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is high because 17 reviews span many years and repeatedly identify the , and workload patterns despite some mixed opinions.

Inside 17 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 55
4 out of 53
3 out of 50
2 out of 52
1 out of 57

Course coverage

PARLG1114 reviews
PARLGL1083 reviews
PARALEGAL1062 reviews
PARLG1012 reviews
1111 review
Show 5 more courses
BUS1321 review
PARA1011 review
PARALEGAL1011 review
PARLG1071 review
PARLG1121 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

9 reported outcomes

A range

3

A 3

B range

3

B+ 1 · B 2

C range

1

C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

2

Not sure yet 2