AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Anahit Asadyan

STAT140 · MATH083 · M140H · MATH102 · GEO083 · MATH70 · M140 · MATH140 · ST0140 · MA140 · 20 lifetime ratings

AI rating
72/100
RMP rating
3.8/5
Take again
75%
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

Take her if you attend consistently and ask questions, but if you need very polished lectures or .

Best fit · Effort For RewardCaring but inconsistentHomework heavyParticipation mattersClear when askedAttendance sensitive
  • Students often describe her as caring, supportive, and willing to help students who try.
  • Several reviews warn that .
  • , and participation matter more than raw course difficulty.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

62/100

An A is realistic with , and effort, but it is not a low-effort free grade.

Online evidence is limited to one time-consuming homework comment, while , and participation.

Is the course easy?

Standard

54/100

The math content is manageable for prepared students, but fast pacing and .

The online review reports clear examples, while and confusion.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

22/100

and participation matter and missing class can hurt students.

Attendance pressure is supported by in-person reviews, while the single .

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

74/100

, but several negative reviews warn about unclear teaching and communication.

The online review is positive, while but still mostly favorable.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

58/100

Grading appears fair with in some sections, but and MyLab complaints prevent calling it lenient.

Format shift

Online evidence mentions time-consuming work, while and tough grader warnings.

Workload

Heavy

35/100

or MyLab, though a few students say it was manageable.

Format shift

The online review directly calls homework time consuming, and .

Teaching experience

Good

72/100

She is often described as caring and knowledgeable, but clarity, organization, and responsiveness are inconsistent.

Format shift

Online evidence is positive but thin, while and serious clarity complaints.

Assessment method

Balanced

66/100

Grades , and occasional projects rather than one single method.

Format shift

Online evidence highlights homework, while , and a project.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

19 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews are mixed, with many praising her care and support while and .

Main concern

Lecture clarity and communication vary by student.

What students said

“she was difficult to understand, the pace was fast.”
M140H
“ .”
MATH083
“Yells at you if youre late or miss class even with a valid excuse.”
MATH140

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

The single online but .

Main concern

.

What students said

“Online HW is time consuming.”
MATH102
“She gets the job done with and .”
MATH102

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

some heavy test weight, but reviews do not clearly prove strict proctoring or open-book policies.

Tests count heavilyPearson MyLab assessmentsTest review in classCanceled final in one section

Assessment risk

Standard

58/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and test preparation, but do not clearly prove proctoring, webcam, or open-book rules.

Tests count heavilyPearson MyLab assessmentsTest review in class
“tests were 9-11 pts each but 30-35% of overall grade.”
MATH140
“She always goes !”
STAT140
“We were supposed to have a final but it got canceled”
MATH140

Online

The online review .

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Awesome prof, if you put the time into her class she will go to any length to help you succeed.”

Voice snapshots generated from 20 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and grading. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

72/100

“She truly inspires her students to learn, lectures are good and .”

📚 Workload Reality

35/100

“Gives lots of homework.”

👍 Recommendation Level

74/100

“I would be happy to have her for my next level of Math class.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Loved her teaching.
  • lectures are very messy and unorganized.
  • she was difficult to understand, the pace was fast.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Just do HW and don't miss classes.
  • She's gives .
  • MyMathLab software she uses is very tricky

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • Honestly cares for her students.
  • Very caring and kind person!
  • She is willing to help you no matter what

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

20

Recent reviews read by the AI

20

Lifetime ratings

86/100

Evidence confidence

Twenty reviews across many years give a consistent picture of a caring but uneven instructor with meaningful workload and .

Inside 20 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 56
4 out of 59
3 out of 52
2 out of 50
1 out of 53

Course coverage

MATH1404 reviews
M1403 reviews
MATH0833 reviews
M140H2 reviews
MATH1022 reviews
Show 5 more courses
MATH702 reviews
GEO0831 review
MA1401 review
ST01401 review
STAT1401 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

10 reported outcomes

A range

3

A 3

B range

5

B+ 1 · B 4

C range

1

C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Drop/Withdrawal 1