AI Rate Professor

Anthropology

Jeongeun Lee

Courses not reported · 1 lifetime ratings

AI rating
27/100
RMP rating
1.0/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

Avoid Jeongeun Lee unless and mostly teach yourself.

Best fit · Self Taught ProSlow classLight early workloadUnclear final assignmentUnapproachableLow engagement
  • The only review says the class was slow and not very educational.
  • Workload was light until a .
  • The student earned an A but still reported a poor learning experience.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

62/100

An A was earned and early work was light, but the .

All evidence comes from one in-person review, with .

Is the course easy?

Beginner

65/100

The class sounds intellectually light and slow, though .

Only one in-person review describes course difficulty.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

The review .

No online or .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

20/100

The student reports , and an unapproachable professor.

Recommendation evidence .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

58/100

The student earned an A, but the review .

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

68/100

Work was fairly light for most of the term but .

Format shift

All workload .

Teaching experience

Awful

25/100

Teaching quality is rated very low because the student learned little and found the class unengaging.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

25/100

The only specific assessment mentioned is a .

Format shift

online evidence.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

The in-person review describes a slow, low-engagement class with and little approachability.

Main concern

.

What students said

“Her class was very slow and I feel like I learned very little, very characteristic of a requirement course.”
70211
“She felt very unapproachable as well.”
70211

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove whether exams, proctoring, open-book rules, or finals are used.

Reviews do not clearly prove an exam policy

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

The but does not clearly prove an exam format or policy.

Final AssignmentNo Clear Exam Evidence
“The work was fairly light until the end of the course in which she gave a to complete.”
70211

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Her class was very slow and I feel like I learned very little, very characteristic of a requirement course.”

Voice snapshots generated from 1 review, highlighting key themes in teaching and grading. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

25/100

“Her class was very slow and I feel like I learned very little, very characteristic of a requirement course.”

📋 Workload Clarity

68/100

“The work was fairly light until the end of the course in which she gave a to complete.”

⚠️ Student Support

20/100

“She felt very unapproachable as well.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Her class was very slow and I feel like I learned very little, very characteristic of a requirement course.
  • She did not speak good English and that made her class less engaging.

Theme 2

📈 About Workload & Grades

  • The work was fairly light until the end of the course in which she gave a to complete.
  • She felt very unapproachable as well.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

1

Recent reviews read by the AI

1

Lifetime ratings

25/100

Evidence confidence

, so confidence is limited despite the detailed negative tone.

Inside 1 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

702111 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values