AI Rate Professor

Theater

Kimberly DeShazo Wilkinson

THEATR130 · 2 lifetime ratings

AI rating
8/100
RMP rating
1.5/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
3.5

The decision

Avoid unless you already know the material well and .

Best fit · Self Taught ProDismissive toneToo many projectsLimited guidanceUseful skillsDifficult to work with
  • Students learned practical theater skills, but both reviews describe major problems with support, tone, or workload.
  • The main concern is not the subject itself but the professor's communication and lack of guidance.
  • Evidence , so confidence is low.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

52/100

An A is possible, but the effort cost is high because projects and limited guidance make the class harder than the grades suggest.

Evidence comes only from in-person reviews, including one class that transitioned online mid-semester but is counted as in person.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

35/100

The hands-on sewing and design work can be informative, but students say the course becomes hard without enough guidance.

Only in-person reviews are available, and difficulty.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

25/100

as necessary, and the skills-based format suggests missing guidance can hurt performance.

, and there is no online review evidence.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

8/100

because of dismissive treatment, too many projects, and insufficient guidance.

Recommendation evidence and is negative.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

50/100

Grades were not terrible, but comments do .

Format shift

Only in-person grades and .

Workload

Heavy

28/100

One student specifically reports too many sewing projects and hard work without enough guidance.

Format shift

Only in-person evidence is available, including a transition-online experience counted under in person by the provided data.

Teaching experience

Awful

18/100

Students describe the instructor as dismissive, condescending, difficult to work with, and .

Format shift

, and both reviews are negative about the teaching experience.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

18/100

The class appears assignment- and project-focused, especially sewing and design work, with .

Format shift

and skills work, with no online assessment evidence.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person evidence is negative overall, with students saying the class teaches useful skills but the professor is dismissive and guidance is weak.

Main concern

Students report , and a difficult instructor dynamic.

What students said

“the teacher was difficult to work with”
THEATR130
“She is overall very dismissive and condescending toward her students.”
THEATR130
“ ”
THEATR130

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove any exam format, quiz format, proctoring, open-book, take-home, midterm, or .

No Clear Exam Evidence

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews do not clearly prove any exam, .

No Clear Exam Evidence

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“She is overall very dismissive and condescending toward her students.”

Voice snapshots generated from 2 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching, workload, and guidance. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

18/100

“the teacher was difficult to work with”

👍 Recommendation Rate

8/100

“if you know your sewing stuff then this class isn' it good luck guys”

📚 Workload Pressure

28/100

“ ”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She is overall very dismissive and condescending toward her students.
  • Has a history of making insensitive comments.

Theme 2

🧵

  • Learned some great skills from the class (sewing, stitching, designing, etc.)

Theme 3

⚠️ About Guidance

  • there wasn' enough guidance online like it was in person
  • the teacher was difficult to work with

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

2

Recent reviews read by the AI

2

Lifetime ratings

28/100

Evidence confidence

, so the negative pattern is important but not broad enough for high confidence.

Inside 2 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 51

Course coverage

THEATR1302 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

1

A+ 1

B range

1

B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values