Mike Wysocky

NURS240 · 1 lifetime ratings

AI rating: 92/100
RMP rating: 5.0/5
Take again: 100%
Difficulty: 3.0

The decision

Wysocky appears excellent for nursing students who want respectful clinical coaching and are willing to be pushed to grow.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerRespectful clinical instructorGrowth focusedHelpful feedbackSupportive but challenging

The only review is strongly positive and describes Wysocky as respectful, patient, and helpful.
He pushes students to improve, so the experience is supportive but not effortless.
Because there is only one review, confidence is limited despite the excellent rating.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

55/100

There is no grade evidence, and the review suggests meaningful effort because he pushes students to grow and improve.

All because there are no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Standard

45/100

The clinical course sounds professionally challenging rather than easy, but the .

All because there are no online reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

The review .

All evidence comes from one in-person review, and .

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

90/100

The single review strongly recommends the instructor through praise for , and growth-focused coaching.

All recommendation because there are no online reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

50/100

The , so leniency cannot be strongly determined.

Format shift

All evidence comes from one in-person review, and .

Workload

Moderate

45/100

The review implies a growth-oriented clinical challenge but gives no specific workload details.

Format shift

All workload evidence comes from one in-person review, with no online evidence.

Teaching experience

Excellent

94/100

The review describes him as respectful, patient, helpful, and effective at pushing students to improve.

Format shift

All teaching because there are no online reviews.

Assessment method

Balanced

50/100

The review does not describe assignments, exams, clinical evaluations, or .

Format shift

All assessment , and assessment methods are not specified.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

The in-person clinical review describes a respectful, patient instructor who pushes students to improve.

Main concern

The evidence is based on only one review.

What students said

“He will push you to grow and improve, but give you the patience and respect that .”
nurs240

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

The review does not clearly describe exams, proctoring, .

Exam policy not clearly proven

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

The , proctoring, open-book, midterm, or .

Exam policy not clearly proven

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice
“He will push you to grow and improve, but give you the patience and respect that .”
Voice snapshots generated from 1 review, highlighting teaching style and growth-focused clinical coaching; credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

94/100

“Professor Wysocky is a great clinical instructor.”

🤝 Respectful Coaching

90/100

“he will treat you like a colleague over a student, and he means it.”

📈 Growth Challenge

55/100

“He will push you to grow and improve”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

Professor Wysocky is a great clinical instructor.
he will treat you like a colleague over a student, and he means it.

Theme 2

📈 About Challenge & Growth

He will push you to grow and improve
give you the patience and respect that .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

Recent reviews read by the AI

Lifetime ratings

35/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is low because there is only one review, even though it is detailed and recent.

Inside 1 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51

4 out of 50

3 out of 50

2 out of 50

1 out of 50

Course coverage

nurs2401 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

No reported values

B range

No reported values

C range

No reported values

D range

No reported values

F

No reported values

No letter grade reported

No reported values