AI Rate Professor

Mass Media

Masha Vasilkovsky

MEA109 · MEA106 · MEA232 · MEA261 · 21 lifetime ratings

AI rating
42/100
RMP rating
2.8/5
Take again
38.1%
Difficulty
3.1

The decision

Take her only if you , and a demanding project workflow.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerDisorganized feedbackTough gradingCaring but polarizingCreative projectsHeavy workload
  • Students are sharply split between seeing her as caring and inspiring or , and unorganized.
  • Getting a good grade is possible, but and critiques require effort and emotional tolerance.
  • Online reviews are more negative overall, especially about organization and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

58/100

An A is possible when work is completed and submitted, but many students describe tough critiques, redo expectations, and substantial project effort.

Online evidence is more work-heavy and negative, while can earn strong grades.

Is the course easy?

Standard

45/100

The creative content is not always intellectually advanced, but and subjective expectations make it harder to navigate.

Online students report more confusion and disorganization, while in-person students report both helpful guidance and .

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

48/100

Reviews mention participation and missing class causing problems, but they do not prove a .

Both formats suggest engagement matters, with online reviews mentioning pace and in-person reviews warning that missed class makes catching up hard.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

42/100

Recommendation depends heavily on whether a student responds well to her subjective critique style and can work through disorganization.

, while in-person reviews are more polarized with several strong positive recommendations.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

52/100

Some students say she is lenient if work is done, but many others call her a .

Format shift

Online reviews emphasize harsh or biased feedback, while completed work.

Workload

Heavy

32/100

Many reviews mention lots of , and a quick pace.

Format shift

Online reviews more often describe heavy workload and complicated methods, while and revisions.

Teaching experience

Poor

38/100

Positive reviews praise care and feedback, but the , and sometimes rude teaching.

Format shift

Online teaching is rated worse for organization, while and confusing instruction.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

18/100

, and submitted assignments rather than exams.

Format shift

Both online and .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

12 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews are mixed, with several students praising her care and leniency while , and poor teaching structure.

Main concern

Students may struggle to understand .

What students said

“she would grade it and be like it's terrible you need to fix everything”
MEA109
“I have learned more from her in one class than in the 4 years I've been at COC.”
MEA232
“As long as you do your boards and submit on time, you are golden.”
MEA109

Remote format

Online

9 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews are mostly negative, citing disorganization, unclear teaching, heavy work, and subjective critiques, with a few strong defenders praising her care and feedback.

Main concern

Online students often felt they had to manage confusion and subjective expectations on their own.

What students said

“ and ”
MEA106
“You have to work for the grade but that preps you for the REAL world!”
MEA109
“MV goes out of her way to help students.”
MEA109

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

The reviews do not clearly describe .

Reviews do not clearly prove exam format

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, quiz format, midterm format, or final format.

Reviews do not clearly prove in-person exam policy

Online

Online reviews do not clearly prove .

Reviews do not clearly prove online exam policy

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Take her only if you , and a demanding project workflow.”

Voice snapshots generated from 21 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and format differences; credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

38/100

“most of the time she never even taught anything”

⚖️

52/100

“As long as you do your boards and submit on time, you are golden.”

👍 Recommendation Level

42/100

“If you have a .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • and
  • doesn't teach properly
  • She wants her students to grow and have fun in her class.

Theme 2

📈 About Workload and Grades

  • You have to work for the grade
  • she is very lenient even with late work
  • Lots of homework

Theme 3

❤️ About Character and Feedback

  • She cares for her students and
  • Constantly belittles students in the guise of improvement

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

21

Recent reviews read by the AI

21

Lifetime ratings

86/100

Evidence confidence

The 21 reviews span several years, include both formats, and show consistent themes about care, critique, disorganization, and workload.

Inside 21 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 57
4 out of 50
3 out of 53
2 out of 53
1 out of 58

Course coverage

MEA10910 reviews
MEA1068 reviews
MEA2612 reviews
MEA2321 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

17 reported outcomes

A range

8

A+ 3 · A 4 · A- 1

B range

3

B+ 2 · B- 1

C range

1

C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

5

Drop/Withdrawal 2 · Not sure yet 1 · Rather not say 2