AI Rate Professor

Graphic Arts

cole moss

GMD144 · GMD101 · GMD142 · 13 lifetime ratings

AI rating
71/100
RMP rating
3.6/5
Take again
61.54%
Difficulty
3.4

The decision

if and can handle tough critiques, participation pressure, and project workload.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerConstructive critiquesTough graderProject-heavyParticipation mattersDesign-focused
  • Students often praise Moss for and real learning growth.
  • The main drawbacks are tough critiques, high standards, long lectures, lateness, and limited lab time.
  • Grades are often strong for students who participate, revise, and manage project workload.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

68/100

Many students earned A grades and one calls it an easy A, but the A usually depends on participation, effort, revisions, and accepting critiques.

, while online evidence shows more tension around standards and critiques.

Is the course easy?

Standard

47/100

The design concepts and projects are manageable but challenging because critiques are intense and expectations can be high.

Both formats show challenging critique-based work, with online reviews adding complaints about lecture pace and lost lab time.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

45/100

Participation clearly matters, and one online review says cameras are required, but reviews do not prove a .

Online evidence includes a camera requirement, while in-person evidence .

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

72/100

and growth, but several negative reviews warn against his style and grading.

, while online reviews are more polarized.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

48/100

Grades are often high, but students repeatedly describe him as a .

Format shift

Online and , though in-person reviews also show many A outcomes.

Workload

Moderate

42/100

Projects are central and can become overwhelming if students do not manage time well.

Format shift

In-person reviews give the clearest workload warnings, while and lecture length.

Teaching experience

Good

76/100

Many and design insight, despite complaints about rambling, lateness, and subjective standards.

Format shift

In-person reviews lean more positive, while online reviews are more divided.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

20/100

The course appears project- and critique-driven, with .

Format shift

Both online and , and critiques.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

8 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

and learning, but repeatedly warn that grading is tough and projects can be challenging.

Main concern

Students who dislike subjective critique or .

What students said

“Cole is tough, but you will learn a lot.”
GMD142
“This class was an easy A.”
GMD101

Remote format

Online

5 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

Online reviews are sharply split between strong praise for feedback and frustration with lateness, long lectures, strict critiques, and camera requirements.

Main concern

Online students may lose lab time to long lectures and may be required to keep cameras on.

What students said

“I learned how to think and view things as a designer .”
GMD144
“Requires camera to be on.”
GMD144

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews , though one online class required cameras during class.

No Clear Exam EvidenceCamera Requirement For Online Class

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

format, proctoring, or book policy.

Online

Online reviews , but one review says cameras were required in class.

Camera Required For ClassNo Clear Exam Evidence
“Requires camera to be on.”
GMD144

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Cole is tough, but you will learn a lot.”

Voice snapshots generated from 13 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching and grading; credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

76/100

“I learned how to think and view things as a designer .”

⚖️

48/100

“ . Everything has to be made the way that he says and if it isn't then it is considered wrong.”

📚 Workload Balance

42/100

“Sometimes the workload can get overwhelming if you don't manage your time well.”

👍 Recommendation Level

72/100

“ if I could!”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • , and the projects he assigns were really neat, and I enjoyed them.
  • , and will be really helpful in the long run.
  • Always late. Nothing is ever to his standards.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • This class was an easy A.
  • Cole is tough, but you will learn a lot.
  • . Everything has to be made the way that he says and if it isn't then it is considered wrong.

Theme 3

🎨

  • Critiques are hard but are all valid, all are critiques to make your work the most attractive for professional work as possible.
  • The , and challenging.
  • and talks WAY too much.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

13

Recent reviews read by the AI

13

Lifetime ratings

88/100

Evidence confidence

Thirteen reviews across formats and years show , and teaching style.

Inside 13 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 55
4 out of 54
3 out of 50
2 out of 52
1 out of 52

Course coverage

GMD1426 reviews
GMD1445 reviews
GMD1012 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

11 reported outcomes

A range

8

A+ 1 · A 6 · A- 1

B range

3

B+ 1 · B 2

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values