AI Rate Professor

Architecture

Svelatna Holt

CAWT116 · CIT116 · 6 lifetime ratings

AI rating
16/100
RMP rating
1.8/5
Take again
20%
Difficulty
3.2

The decision

Avoid unless you can work independently, follow directions exactly, and .

Best fit · Self Taught ProHarsh GradingHeavy Weekly WorkPoor CommunicationUnorganizedCostly Required Software
  • Most reviews describe harsh all-or-nothing grading with little flexibility.
  • Online students and required paid software.
  • A good grade is possible, but students say it takes patience and exact compliance.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

32/100

A grades appear possible, but students say small guideline mistakes can become zeros and the .

Online evidence shows strict grading and weekly work, while the .

Is the course easy?

Standard

42/100

The course content sounds doable, but unclear organization, detailed requirements, and itself.

Online reviews emphasize detailed assignment rules, while the disorganization.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

45/100

Reviews do not clearly prove a , but online participation and timely submissions appear important.

Evidence comes mainly from online reviews mentioning participation and weekly work, with .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

20/100

Most students advise against taking her because of , and an unprofessional experience.

Both formats are negative, but the online pattern is much stronger because it has five reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

15/100

, and little partial credit.

Format shift

Online reviews give the clearest evidence of , while the as a tough grader.

Workload

Heavy

25/100

Students report lots of , and work even during spring break.

Format shift

Online reviews consistently mention heavy work, while the and lecture-heavy structure.

Teaching experience

Awful

22/100

Most comments describe little effort, poor communication, disorganization, and unprofessional behavior.

Format shift

Online reviews focus on email and , while the and unprofessional.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

25/100

The class , and required software rather than exams.

Format shift

Online reviews mostly discuss homework and submissions, while and lectures.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

The and describes the class as unorganized and unprofessional.

Main concern

There is .

What students said

“This teacher is absolutely terribly unorganized and .”
CAWT116

Remote format

Online

5 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews are mostly negative, citing strict grading, weekly workload, paid software, and inconsistent communication.

Main concern

Students risk zeros for small submission or guideline mistakes.

What students said

“you have to follow all guidelines or you'll get an automatic 0”
CAWT116
“Its an online class how are you not responding to emails!!!!”
CAWT116
“You definitely have work to do every week so be ready to work for your grade.”
CAWT116

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mention a but do not clearly prove exam format, proctoring, webcam rules, or open-book policy.

Midterm MentionedReviews Do Not Clearly Prove ProctoringReviews Do Not Clearly Prove Open Book

Assessment risk

Varies

45/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

The , proctoring, open-book rules, quizzes, midterms, or finals.

Online

Online reviews mention a missed midterm but do not clearly prove webcam, proctoring, .

Midterm MentionedExam Policy Unclear
“I had a health issue & ”
CAWT116

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“you have to follow all guidelines or you'll get an automatic 0”

Voice snapshots generated from 6 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and communication. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

22/100

“Ms. Holt puts very little to no effort in this class.”

⚖️

15/100

“Instead of partial credit she gives you none”

👍 Recommendation Rate

20/100

“ . horrible unprofessional professor.”

Theme 1

⚖️

  • you have to follow all guidelines or you'll get an automatic 0
  • , but doable if you have patience.

Theme 2

📚 About Workload

  • You definitely have work to do every week so be ready to work for your grade.
  • Unless you want to have to sludge through her ridiculous ways of doing things & her giving work on .

Theme 3

📩 About Communication

  • she continues to ignore me and not discuss this matter
  • Its an online class how are you not responding to emails!!!!

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

6

Recent reviews read by the AI

6

Lifetime ratings

70/100

Evidence confidence

Six reviews across several years show a consistent negative pattern, but one format has only a single review and some comments are old.

Inside 6 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 52
1 out of 53

Course coverage

CAWT1165 reviews
CIT1161 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

3 reported outcomes

A range

3

A 2 · A- 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values