AI Rate Professor

Business

Judith Sack

PARLGL180 · BUS211 · 15 lifetime ratings

AI rating
9/100
RMP rating
1.7/5
Take again
13.33%
Difficulty
4.6

The decision

Avoid unless you can devote major time to one class and , and .

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerOverwhelming WorkloadHarsh GradingConfusing OrganizationSlow FeedbackGroup Project Heavy
  • Most students describe the workload as , and difficult to manage.
  • as harsh, slow, and sometimes unresolved.
  • A few students had positive experiences, but the if possible.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

MissionImpossible

14/100

Getting an A appears very difficult because students report , and dropped or failing experiences.

Online evidence strongly supports a hard A, while but also negative about workload and lecture value.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

22/100

The course feels difficult because , and often poorly organized.

Online reviews emphasize confusion and nonstop work, while and boring lectures.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

35/100

Reviews , but frequent deadlines, group coordination, and participation expectations reduce flexibility.

Online reviews show strict time pressure from deadlines and group work, while .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

13/100

Most students do not recommend her because the workload, grading, organization, and .

Online reviews are overwhelmingly negative, and the .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

12/100

Students repeatedly call her a tough grader and , and .

Format shift

Online reviews provide the strongest grading complaints, while and lecture problems.

Workload

Overwhelming

5/100

Students describe nonstop , and deadlines several days per week.

Format shift

Online reviews overwhelmingly describe excessive workload, while .

Teaching experience

Awful

18/100

Most comments describe her courses as , and .

Format shift

Online reviews focus on organization, workload, and , while and low-value activities.

Assessment method

Balanced

62/100

Assessment appears to mix heavy , and long exams.

Format shift

Online reviews mention assignments, discussions, quizzes, exams, and essays, while , and in-class assignments.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

but negative, with complaints about unrealistic coursework, boring lectures, and low-value activities.

Main concern

The and includes one review describing an online class despite being counted as in person.

What students said

“The coursework is unruly and unrealistic.”
BUS211
“Her lectures are also very boring and long.”
PARLGL180

Remote format

Online

13 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

Online reviews are mostly severe, citing excessive homework, harsh , and group work.

Main concern

The workload can dominate students' schedules and .

What students said

“Assignments due 4-5 days a week!”
PARLGL180
“Just one class with if you let it.”
PARLGL180
“There are several exams which are ridiculously long (3 to 4 hours with ).”
BUS211

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

because students describe long, difficult exams with huge essay questions, but proctoring and .

Long ExamsHuge Essay QuestionsSpecific Difficult Test QuestionsReviews Do Not Clearly Prove ProctoringReviews Do Not Clearly Prove Open Book

Assessment risk

Strict

22/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews tag one review as test heavy, but comments do not clearly prove exam format, .

Test Heavy Tag OnlyExam Policy Unclear

Online

, and difficult specific test questions, but do not clearly prove webcam, proctoring, Lockdown Browser, or open-book rules.

Long ExamsHuge Essay QuestionsSpecific Difficult QuestionsQuizzes Mentioned
“There are several exams which are ridiculously long (3 to 4 hours with ).”
BUS211
“ and too difficult.”
BUS211

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Just one class with if you let it.”

Voice snapshots generated from 15 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and exams. Credibility rating: High.

📚 Workload Pressure

5/100

“Assignments due 4-5 days a week!”

⚖️

12/100

“she grades very harshly.”

🎯 Teaching Quality

18/100

“ .”

Theme 1

📚 About Workload

  • Be aware that she gives an awful amount of work.
  • Assignments due 4-5 days a week!
  • There are .

Theme 2

⚖️

  • she grades very harshly.
  • She grades work super slowly.
  • on assignments.

Theme 3

🧭 About Organization

  • Confusing and difficult.
  • Wish I had the option of giving a zero. .
  • Syllabus was impossible to follow & she never answered emails.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

15

Recent reviews read by the AI

15

Lifetime ratings

88/100

Evidence confidence

Fifteen reviews from 2018 to 2026 give detailed and consistent complaints, though .

Inside 15 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 53
1 out of 510

Course coverage

BUS2118 reviews
PARLGL1807 reviews

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

14 reported outcomes

A range

2

A 2

B range

1

B 1

C range

1

C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

10

Drop/Withdrawal 2 · Incomplete 1 · Not sure yet 1 · Rather not say 6