AI Rate Professor

Radio, TV & Film

Joseph Lanthier

RTVF117 · RTVF072 · MEA116 · EDITING · RTVF0218 · RTVF118 · 21 lifetime ratings

AI rating
32/100
RMP rating
2.6/5
Take again
30.77%
Difficulty
2.2

The decision

if and want a manageable grade more than a warm teaching style.

Best fit · Easy A HunterEasy ABoring LecturesIntimidating FeedbackEditing FundamentalsIn-Class Projects
  • Grades are often easy if students follow directions and .
  • Many students criticize his lectures, tone, patience, and .
  • Students who want strict editing fundamentals may benefit more than beginners needing support.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

82/100

Many students report A grades and say passing is easy if you follow directions, show up, and complete the projects.

Online and , though online work may be time consuming.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

68/100

The editing work is usually basic or project-based, but beginners may struggle because his support and .

Online reviews suggest easier logistics, while and in-class project work.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

20/100

Several comments say work is completed in class, participation matters, and missing class creates problems.

Attendance evidence mainly comes from in-person reviews, while online reviews do .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

35/100

Recommendation is low because many students dislike his attitude and lectures despite the grade often being easy.

Both formats include serious complaints, but and boring lectures.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

76/100

Grades are often high and students say following directions is enough, though some call him a .

Format shift

Online reviews directly say an A is likely if directions are followed, and .

Workload

Moderate

58/100

The workload centers on modules and projects that can often be finished in class, but some students find it time consuming.

Format shift

Online work is called time consuming, while if students stay on task.

Teaching experience

Poor

35/100

Students frequently describe him as boring, rude, intimidating, or unhelpful, with a minority praising his editing knowledge and feedback.

Format shift

Both formats include negative teaching comments, while fundamentals and feedback.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

20/100

Grades appear to rely mostly on editing modules, projects, handouts, and a .

Format shift

Both formats point to project-based assessment, with stronger in-person evidence from module and final-project comments.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

19 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Easy A Hunter

In-person reviews show an easy-to-pass editing class with repetitive lectures and a .

Main concern

His rude or blunt delivery makes students afraid to ask questions.

What students said

“Extremely easy A. Extremely boring. Learned a lot on my own.”
RTVF117
“the whole class was basically too scared to ask because of his attitude.”
EDITING
“All of the work he gives you can be completed in class if you stay on task.”
MEA116

Remote format

Online

2 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Online reviews say the course can be easier and grade-friendly if directions are followed, but one review calls the experience awful.

Main concern

The online experience may still feel boring, time consuming, and unsupported.

What students said

“Work is time consuming but if you do what he says you will get an A.”
MEA116
“Incredibly mean to his students and literally teaches nothing.”
MEA116

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove proctoring, webcam, Lockdown Browser, open-book, or closed-book policy, and assessment appears mostly project-based.

Project-Based FinalDefinitions FinalEditing Projects

Assessment risk

Varies

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and editing projects, but do not clearly prove book policy or proctoring requirements.

Definitions FinalEditing ProjectsFinal Project
“ .”
MEA116
“hand in the .”
RTVF0218

Online

Online reviews do not clearly prove exam format, .

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Extremely easy A. Extremely boring. Learned a lot on my own.”

Voice snapshots generated from 21 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and student comfort. Credibility rating: High.

📈 Grade Ease

82/100

“All you have to do is listen and hand in the .”

🎯 Teaching Quality

35/100

“Extremely easy A. Extremely boring. Learned a lot on my own.”

⚠️ Classroom Climate

35/100

“the whole class was basically too scared to ask because of his attitude.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Boring lectures.
  • Very lecture heavy but you definitely learn a lot about editing.
  • he will drone on for multiple hours

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Work is time consuming but if you do what he says you will get an A.
  • All of the work he gives you can be completed in class if you stay on task.
  • Extremely easy A.

Theme 3

💬

  • He is honest, holds you accountable, and simply wants to see the
  • He may be a , but .
  • If you don't do the work his way, it's wrong.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

21

Recent reviews read by the AI

21

Lifetime ratings

86/100

Evidence confidence

Twenty-one reviews over many years give rich evidence, though older reviews and polarized opinions reduce certainty slightly.

Inside 21 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 53
4 out of 54
3 out of 53
2 out of 54
1 out of 57

Course coverage

MEA11612 reviews
EDITING3 reviews
RTVF1183 reviews
RTVF02181 review
RTVF0721 review
Show 1 more courses
RTVF1171 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

12 reported outcomes

A range

9

A+ 3 · A 5 · A- 1

B range

1

B+ 1

C range

2

C 1 · C- 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values