AI Rate Professor

Paralegal Studies

Corey Carter

PARLGL111 · PARLGL101 · 6 lifetime ratings

AI rating
78/100
RMP rating
3.8/5
Take again
66.67%
Difficulty
2.7

The decision

if you want practical legal context and can handle lecture-heavy teaching with some self-guided learning.

Best fit · Effort For RewardLecture heavyPractical legal experienceFew assignmentsClear expectationsMixed engagement
  • Online reviews are mostly , and useful legal experience.
  • In-person reviews are more lukewarm, , and boring lectures.
  • The class is not especially hard, but , and self-direction.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

66/100

Grades seem manageable because there are few assignments and no unfair surprises, but students still need to read, study, and keep up.

Online reviews suggest fair effort with clear expectations, while self-guided textbook work.

Is the course easy?

Standard

55/100

The material is practical but moderately challenging, especially because lectures are heavy and students must engage with legal reading.

Online reviews frame the challenge as useful and structured, while .

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

58/100

Participation and attention matter, but reviews .

Online reviews mention participation and breakout sessions, while but not strict attendance rules.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

70/100

, but recommendations are limited by lecture heaviness and uneven clarity.

Online students are mostly more positive, while .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

63/100

Students describe few assignments, , and no unfair exam surprises, but also mention vague assignments and .

Format shift

Online grading appears clearer and fairer, while because some assignments were vague.

Workload

Light

76/100

The workload is generally light because , though reading and participation still matter.

Format shift

Online workload includes reading, projects, and participation, while but less structured.

Teaching experience

Good

72/100

He offers useful attorney experience and clear expectations for many students, but some find the lectures boring or insufficiently hands-on.

Format shift

Online teaching is viewed more favorably, while and textbook-centered.

Assessment method

Balanced

58/100

Assessment , and finals, with no single method fully dominating.

Format shift

Online evidence mentions assignments, projects, midterms, and finals, while and weekly quizzes.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

as acceptable but not especially engaging, with textbook-heavy learning and .

Main concern

Students may need to rely on the textbook because lectures and .

What students said

“Most of the learning will be you engaging with the textbook.”
PARLGL111
“There were 2 main assignments but were very vague and .”
PARLGL101

Remote format

Online

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Online reviews mostly praise practical content, clear expectations, office hours, and manageable assignments, with one strong complaint about limited drafting and .

Main concern

Lecture-heavy delivery and uneven feedback may frustrate students who want hands-on drafting practice.

What students said

“There are no unfair surprises on the .”
PARLGL111
“He offers challenging material that helps educate.”
PARLGL111
“He admits that he doesn't assign much HW cause he doesn't .”
PARLGL111

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mention weekly quizzes, midterms, and finals with no unfair surprises, but .

MidtermsFinalsWeekly QuizzesNo unfair surprisesNo clear proctoring evidence

Assessment risk

Standard

62/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, but do not clearly prove midterm, final, open-book, closed-book, or proctoring policies.

Weekly QuizzesNo clear exam policy evidence
“There is a but .”
PARLGL101

Online

Online reviews mention midterms and finals with no unfair surprises, but do not clearly prove webcam, Lockdown Browser, open-book, or proctoring policies.

MidtermsFinalsNo unfair surprisesNo clear proctoring evidence
“There are no unfair surprises on the .”
PARLGL111

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Professor Carter is one of the .”

Voice snapshots generated from 6 reviews, highlighting format differences in , and practical value. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

72/100

“you'll learn a lot from his experience as an attorney.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

70/100

“The knowledge gained is practical and useful in the field.”

📚 Workload Balance

76/100

“There are only a few assignments, so it's easy to learn if you study & keep up with the topics.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • While he is lecture heavy, you get a lot out of class if you ask questions & pay attention.
  • Corey is sharp, engaged, friendly, and he lays out very clearly what he expects students to learn.
  • Lectures didn't really follow the text and were pretty boring.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • There are only a few assignments, so it's easy to learn if you study & keep up with the topics.
  • There are no unfair surprises on the .
  • .

Theme 3

⚖️ About Practical Value

  • The knowledge gained is practical and useful in the field.
  • He provides ample opportunities to approach the subject matter through reading, projects, breakout group sessions, and regular office hours.
  • we didn't learn to draft pleadings or motions.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

6

Recent reviews read by the AI

6

Lifetime ratings

66/100

Evidence confidence

Six reviews provide useful detail and show a , but the small in-person sample lowers certainty.

Inside 6 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 53
4 out of 50
3 out of 52
2 out of 51
1 out of 50

Course coverage

PARLGL1115 reviews
PARLGL1011 review

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

4 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

1

B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

2

Not sure yet 1 · Rather not say 1