AI Rate Professor

Engineering

Jeff Koerner

SURV110 · ENG101 · 3 lifetime ratings

AI rating
93/100
RMP rating
4.7/5
Take again
100%
Difficulty
2.3

The decision

if you want a supportive engineering professor who explains expectations clearly and helps with practical work.

Best fit · Beginner FriendlyCaring and accessibleProfessional insightClear exam expectationsHands-on helpSome group work
  • Students describe him as , and experienced in engineering practice.
  • ENG101 seems manageable, while SURV110 may feel tougher because of AutoCAD troubleshooting.
  • because lectures and and assignments.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

78/100

Grades look favorable and ENG101 is not too difficult, but , and technical assignments.

.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

70/100

The , though AutoCAD and surveying work can still be tough for some students.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

65/100

as strictly mandatory, but lectures and and assignments.

.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

92/100

Students recommend him because , and helpful outside class.

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

76/100

Reported grades are high and students describe clear expectations, but there is not enough evidence of .

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

58/100

, and technical assignments, but students do not describe it as overwhelming.

Format shift

All .

Teaching experience

Excellent

90/100

Students consistently praise his caring attitude, professional experience, responsiveness, and hands-on help.

Format shift

All .

Assessment method

Balanced

52/100

, and group projects, suggesting a balanced assessment mix.

Format shift

All .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

In-person reviews are strongly positive, with students praising his caring style, practical expertise, and hands-on support.

Main concern

Some students , and homework.

What students said

“ , and understanding professor.”
ENG101
“Always responds to emails and .”
ENG101
“He is hands on in helping us troubleshoot the program and assignments.”
SURV110

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

, but they do not clearly prove open-book, proctoring, webcam, or .

Clear Exam ExpectationsLabs Support Exams

Assessment risk

Standard

66/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews only show that format or proctoring rules.

Clear Exam Expectations
“Always responds to emails and .”
ENG101

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ , and understanding professor.”

Voice snapshots generated from 3 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching, workload, and support. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

90/100

“He is hands on in helping us troubleshoot the program and assignments.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

92/100

“Great teacher and he obviously enjoys talking about engineering.”

⚖️ Grade Value

78/100

“You'll definitely learn a lot in this class and it isn't too difficult.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • , and understanding professor.
  • Great teacher and he obviously enjoys talking about engineering.
  • Good instruction for a course that was tough for me.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Work

  • You'll definitely learn a lot in this class and it isn't too difficult.
  • He is hands on in helping us troubleshoot the program and assignments.
  • Lectures are handed out during each class to be filled in, so it probably is a good idea to attend class (especially for labs).

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

3

Recent reviews read by the AI

3

Lifetime ratings

62/100

Evidence confidence

, but they are detailed and mostly consistent across several years.

Inside 3 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

ENG1012 reviews
SURV1101 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

2

A+ 1 · A 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values