AI Rate Professor

Computer Science

Richa Ranalkar

CMPSCI111 · 3 lifetime ratings

AI rating
62/100
RMP rating
3.7/5
Take again
66.67%
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

if you can learn independently and ask for help, but avoid if you need energetic lectures.

Best fit · Self Taught ProLecture heavyHelpful when askedMixed teaching clarityComputer science motivatedExtra credit
  • Students disagree sharply on teaching quality, from slide-reading complaints to strong praise for .
  • Getting an A appears possible with motivation, notes, checkpoint questions, and review quizzes.
  • All available evidence is from in-person CMPSCI111 reviews.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

68/100

An A is realistic if you , and do the checkpoint questions, but it is not effortless.

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with .

Is the course easy?

Standard

55/100

The course content seems manageable but depends heavily on student motivation and outside review.

All course difficulty evidence comes from in-person CMPSCI111 reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

Reviews do .

Only in-person reviews exist, and they .

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

63/100

Recommendation is mixed because some students praise her help and explanations while one strongly criticizes her professionalism and lecture style.

All recommendation evidence comes from in-person reviews, with no online comparison.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

72/100

Grades and suggest grading is fairly forgiving for students who complete the review work.

Format shift

and easy quizzes.

Workload

Moderate

58/100

Workload appears normal for an intro programming course, with homework and review quizzes but no signs of overwhelming work.

Format shift

All workload evidence is from in-person CMPSCI111 reviews.

Teaching experience

Average

60/100

Teaching quality is inconsistent, with useful help and and boring lectures.

Format shift

and very positive teaching experiences.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

Assessment evidence points , and a final review rather than a purely exam-based course.

Format shift

and quizzes.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

support for motivated students but complaints about dull slide-based lectures.

Main concern

Lectures may feel boring or low-effort unless you actively study outside class.

What students said

“just reads the slides and makes us buy a online course to do the homework”
CMPSCI111
“If you ask her for help she will help you.”
CMPSCI111
“Her style of explaining code line execution with variables ( .”
CMPSCI111

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mention quizzes and final review preparation but do not clearly prove a .

QuizzesFinal ReviewNo Clear Proctoring Evidence

Assessment risk

Standard

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and reviewing for the final, but do not clearly prove open-book, closed-book, or proctoring rules.

QuizzesFinal ReviewNo Clear Proctoring Evidence
“ if you do the checkpoint questions and ”
CMPSCI111

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“If you ask her for help she will help you.”

Voice snapshots generated from 3 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and support. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

60/100

“Her style of explaining code line execution with variables ( .”

📈 Effort For A

68/100

“ if you do the checkpoint questions and ”

⚠️ Lecture Risk

45/100

“just reads the slides and makes us buy a online course to do the homework”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • just reads the slides and makes us buy a online course to do the homework
  • Her style of explaining code line execution with variables ( .

Theme 2

📈 About Grades And Work

  • if you do the checkpoint questions and
  • this class if only easy if you LIKE compsci and are motivated to go over notes and read apart from class

Theme 3

❤️ About Helpfulness

  • If you ask her for help she will help you.
  • I asked for help and .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

3

Recent reviews read by the AI

3

Lifetime ratings

58/100

Evidence confidence

, but they include detailed comments and consistent course coverage.

Inside 3 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 50

Course coverage

CMPSCI1113 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

3 reported outcomes

A range

2

A+ 1 · A 1

B range

1

B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values