AI Rate Professor

Philosophy

S. Morris

PHILO101 · PHILO7743 · PHILO106 · PHIL101 · PHILO205 · PHILOSOPHY106 · PHYLPACE · 26 lifetime ratings

AI rating
66/100
RMP rating
3.7/5
Take again
50%
Difficulty
2.4

The decision

if you value a caring professor and can stay engaged, but be cautious online because exams and communication draw complaints.

Best fit · Effort For RewardCaring but inconsistentLecture heavyEasy if engagedTricky examsAccent concerns
  • Students often describe Morris as kind and caring, but teaching clarity varies widely.
  • In-person classes are often manageable or easy if , and study the text.
  • Online reviews are weaker, with , and tricky quizzes or exams.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

76/100

Many in-person students say an A is easy with participation, notes, and modest studying, but and .

In-person reviews often call the class easy, while online reviews warn that /B outcome.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

66/100

The course is often described as simple or laid back, but philosophy concepts, readings, and students.

In-person courses sound easier and more discussion-based, while online and self-study.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

48/100

Attendance or participation appears important because students repeatedly say to pay attention, participate, and .

In-person reviews emphasize participation and class notes, while and participation.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

58/100

Recommendation depends on format and learning style because students praise her care but , and online support.

, while online reviews are more hesitant or negative.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

62/100

Grading can be forgiving for engaged students, but tricky exams and .

Format shift

In-person reviews include many easy-A claims, while as high-impact and tricky.

Workload

Light

78/100

Workload is generally light, with , and few major tests.

Format shift

Online work includes readings, discussions, short papers, and exams, while as .

Teaching experience

Average

62/100

Her care and willingness to help are strong, but clarity, pacing, accent, and classroom control receive repeated criticism.

Format shift

In-person reviews are polarized but often warm, while online reviews are and communication issues.

Assessment method

Balanced

58/100

, and exams rather than relying on one method.

Format shift

Online reviews mention discussions, papers, quizzes, and exams, while , and participation.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

23 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

but generally more favorable, praising her care and discussions while noting boring lectures, accent issues, and .

Main concern

You need to pay attention, participate, and tolerate a traditional lecture style that .

What students said

“She is truly a wonderful, kind and caring person.”
PHILO101
“Everything on the to pay attention and .”
PHIL101
“Terrible teacher!! and not just cause of her accent, but because .”
PHIL101

Remote format

Online

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews are mixed to negative, with simple assignments and , and weak communication.

Main concern

Online students and handle high-stakes quizzes or exams.

What students said

“it's super hard to get ahold of her (especially in an online class).”
101
“ .”
PHILO101
“The and though I read carefully and took extensive notes.”
101

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

because some students call tests easy while .

Tricky ExamsEasy Tests In Some SectionsQuizzesText-Based ExamsNo Clear Proctoring Evidence

Assessment risk

Varies

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and text-based exams, with conflicting reports that they are either easy or confusing.

Text-Based ExamsEasy Tests In Some SectionsConfusing Tests In Some SectionsQuizzes
“ ”
PHILO101
“Everything on the tests is covered in class”
PHIL101
“ ”
PHILO106

Online

Online reviews mention tricky quizzes and exams, but do not clearly prove webcam, proctoring, Lockdown Browser, open-book, or closed-book rules.

Tricky ExamsHigh-Point QuizzesOpen-Ended QuestionsNo Clear Proctoring Evidence
“ .”
PHILO101
“ so .”
101
“The and ”
101

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“She is truly a wonderful, kind and caring person.”

Voice snapshots generated from 26 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and format differences. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

62/100

“She is truly a wonderful, kind and caring person.”

📈 Grade Effort

76/100

“As long as you put a little effort, and I mean a little effort this class is an easy A.”

⚠️

55/100

“ .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She is truly a wonderful, kind and caring person.
  • Her lecture style is very traditional, but gave me a .
  • Terrible teacher!! and not just cause of her accent, but because .

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty And Grades

  • As long as you put a little effort, and I mean a little effort this class is an easy A.
  • I got an A but had to actually work for it.
  • .

Theme 3

💬 About Class Experience

  • .
  • I found myself falling asleep at slower times but overall I enjoyed the class
  • it's super hard to get ahold of her (especially in an online class).

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

26

Recent reviews read by the AI

26

Lifetime ratings

88/100

Evidence confidence

Twenty-six reviews across online and , though many reviews are old and opinions are polarized.

Inside 26 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 59
4 out of 510
3 out of 53
2 out of 51
1 out of 53

Course coverage

PHILO1019 reviews
PHIL1018 reviews
1012 reviews
PHILO1062 reviews
PHILO2052 reviews
Show 3 more courses
PHILO77431 review
PHILOSOPHY1061 review
PHYLPACE1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

7 reported outcomes

A range

5

A 4 · A- 1

B range

2

B+ 1 · B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values