AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Alexander Bojkov

MATH025 · STATS131 · MATH102 · MATH096 · MATH60 · MATH05813770 · MATHO70 · MATH070 · STATS140 · MATH70 · MATH060 · MATH140 · MATH058 · 40 lifetime ratings

AI rating
68/100
RMP rating
3.5/5
Take again
63.16%
Difficulty
3.2

The decision

Take him if you can keep up with online homework and learn from practice guides, but if .

Best fit · Effort For RewardClear test prepHeavy online homeworkSarcastic toneHelpful if askedInconsistent accessibility
  • Many students say .
  • Workload is often heavy because of ALEKS, MyMathLab, MyStatLab, or .
  • Teaching is polarizing, with and sarcasm or poor accessibility for others.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

66/100

Getting an A is realistic when students complete the and study guides, but the workload and self-direction are real costs.

Online and and test guides, while online reviews add more concern about poor communication.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

61/100

The math content is often manageable because tests mirror practice, but pace, accent, and .

teaching, while online evidence is more mixed on understanding lectures.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

42/100

Several reviews warn that skipping class hurts, but comments do not prove a .

In-person comments mention needing class more often, while online and professor availability.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

64/100

Students recommend him when they value structured practice, but many hesitate because of , and limited accessibility.

, while online reviews include sharper communication complaints.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

58/100

Grading looks fair to somewhat lenient when homework and reviews are completed, but .

Format shift

Online comments include both an A with repeatable homework and an F tied to poor communication, while grading.

Workload

Heavy

28/100

Many reviews describe a large amount of and frustrating.

Format shift

Both formats mention lots of homework, with in-person reviews especially emphasizing ALEKS, MyMathLab, Pearson, and weekly practice.

Teaching experience

Average

64/100

He often teaches clearly with useful examples, but sarcasm, lateness, accent concerns, and poor accessibility create a very uneven experience.

Format shift

and more long-term consistency, while online reviews are more negative about communication.

Assessment method

Balanced

58/100

, and occasional projects rather than one single assessment type.

Format shift

Online comments emphasize homework and tests, while , and online homework systems.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

36 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews are broadly better but and complaints about lateness, sarcasm, and .

Main concern

The class rewards practice but can feel frustrating if .

What students said

“the but different numbers.”
MATH096
“Lots of homework!!!”
MATH102

Remote format

Online

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews are mixed, with but serious complaints about contact and clarity.

Main concern

Students may struggle to get timely help or know their current grade.

What students said

“There was a lot of homework for the preparation for the tests but most of the questions were from the homework so if .”
MATH102
“ .”
MATH140

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews consistently say tests are predictable when students use homework, practice tests, or study guides, but .

Study Guides Match TestsPractice Tests Similar to ExamsHomework Similar to Tests

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

78/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, reviews, or homework, but they do not clearly prove closed-book rules or strict proctoring.

Study Guides Match TestsHomework Similar to Tests
“the but different numbers.”
MATH096
“ ! no tricks.”
MATH070

Online

Online reviews say tests are easy or similar to practice when students study, but they do not clearly prove webcam, proctoring, Lockdown Browser, or open-book rules.

Practice Tests Similar to ExamsStudy Guide Helps Tests
“The as the the .”
MATH140
“ if you study the study guide”
STATS140

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Overall solid choice. and he welcomed questions. so you know exactly what to study.”

Voice snapshots generated from 40 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and accessibility. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

64/100

“He actually taught really well and if you asked questions.”

📚 Workload Reality

28/100

“There is A LOT of .”

⚖️ Grade Path

66/100

“If you do the work you will get an A.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • He teaches step by step and my mathlab.com is so helpful!
  • He goes kinda fast but pauses a lot for questions.
  • his responses make me feel embarrassed from my answer

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • The though because you can do the questions until you get 100% on them.
  • so you know exactly what to study.
  • . has no office hours, cant make appointment with him.

Theme 3

📚 About Workload

  • Lots of homework!!!
  • ALL HW IS ONLINE through a third party program.
  • although I did learn a lot.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

40

Recent reviews read by the AI

40

Lifetime ratings

90/100

Evidence confidence

Forty reviews across many years give strong coverage, though older reviews and mixed course levels add some noise.

Inside 40 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 59
4 out of 519
3 out of 53
2 out of 55
1 out of 54

Course coverage

MATH1028 reviews
MATH1408 reviews
MATH0605 reviews
MATH0705 reviews
MATH0584 reviews
Show 8 more courses
MATH0252 reviews
MATH602 reviews
MATH058137701 review
MATH0961 review
MATH701 review
MATHO701 review
STATS1311 review
STATS1401 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

17 reported outcomes

A range

8

A+ 1 · A 6 · A- 1

B range

3

B+ 1 · B 2

C range

1

C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

1

F 1

No letter grade reported

4

Not sure yet 2 · Pass 2