AI Rate Professor

Physical Ed

Robert Dos Remedio

KPET201 · KPEI152 · KPEA101B · KPEI201 · PE · HLTHSCI100 · HLTHSCIENCE · HLTH100 · PE102 · HEALTH100 · HLHSCI100 · KPEA125 · KPEA130 · 31 lifetime ratings

AI rating
49/100
RMP rating
3.2/5
Take again
50%
Difficulty
2.5

The decision

if you can follow schedules closely and tolerate unclear grading, especially in online or writing-heavy classes.

Best fit · Effort For RewardEasy A PotentialHarsh GradingPoor InstructionsAttendance MattersKnowledgeable Coach
  • Many students say the class can be easy if you keep up and attend.
  • Negative , and weak communication.
  • Fitness and in-person activity classes sound stronger than online or assignment-heavy health courses.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

68/100

An A , and routine work, but vague assignment grading can unexpectedly cost points.

Online evidence is more risky because students report , while in-person activity classes include several very easy A comments.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

66/100

The course content is usually basic health or fitness material, though some KPET-style sections feel demanding because of workload and unclear expectations.

Online comments describe easy content with more self-management, while in-person comments range from simple walking classes to harder training or assignment-heavy sections.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

25/100

, and multiple comments say showing up is necessary.

In-person , while online reviews emphasize frequent participation and deadline tracking.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

50/100

Students recommend him for easy or practical classes but strongly warn against sections with poor communication and .

Online recommendations are split, while in-person recommendations depend heavily on course type and tolerance for strict expectations.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

48/100

Some students report easy grading and , but many others describe harsh or .

Format shift

Online , while in-person reviews include both easy grading and severe assignment complaints.

Workload

Moderate

55/100

Several classes are light, but other reviews mention frequent discussions, papers, logs, labs, or lots of homework.

Format shift

Online reviews often require steady schedule management, while in-person workload varies from minimal activity work to heavy KPET assignments.

Teaching experience

Average

54/100

He is often described as knowledgeable, but many students say he communicates poorly, gives weak feedback, or does not clearly teach.

Format shift

Online teaching receives more criticism for lack of communication, while in-person coaching and fitness teaching gets stronger praise.

Assessment method

Balanced

50/100

Assessment appears to mix participation, quizzes, papers, discussions, projects, and .

Format shift

Online reviews mention discussions, quizzes, and research work, while in-person reviews add attendance, papers, projects, and open-note tests.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

23 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews range from very easy activity classes to frustrating courses with , and .

Main concern

Attendance and course difficulty suggests.

What students said

“All you have to do is show up, walk, and that's it.”
KPEA125
“ .”
HLHSCI100
“This class was more of a pain than calc 3.”
KPET201

Remote format

Online

8 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews are sharply mixed, with some students finding the class easy and , and poor communication.

Main concern

Online students must manage deadlines and vague instructions without much support.

What students said

“His so it's hard to follow what he wants.”
KPET201
“He does not give reminders, you need to be on top of schedule.”
HLTHSCI100
“This professor does not communicate with students.”
KPET201

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exam evidence is mixed, with some open-note or easy quizzes but and harsh essay exams.

Open-Note TestsQuizzesMidterm And Final EssaysUnclear Test Alignment

Assessment risk

Varies

58/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person evidence includes open-note exams in one health class and and proctoring evidence.

Open-Note TestsMidterm And Final EssaysQuizzes
“Allows notes for .”
HLTH100
“He grades very harshly on the midterm and .”
KPET201

Online

, and , but they do not clearly prove webcam, proctoring, Lockdown Browser, or open-book rules.

QuizzesTestsExtra Credit
“Tests didn't reflect information in new book, most reflected old information, so !”
HLTHSCIENCE
“He also offered .”
HLTHSCI100

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ if you want to pass with minimal to no effort.”

Voice snapshots generated from 31 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and format differences. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

54/100

“He is extremely hard and a lot of work.”

⚖️

48/100

“ discussed.”

📈 Easy A Potential

68/100

“Easy A, !”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • He really knows what hes talking about.
  • He does not communicate with students.
  • He replied quick to my emails.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty And Grades

  • All you have to do is show up, walk, and that's it.
  • He graded hard for no reason whatsoever.
  • .

Theme 3

📝 About Workload And Exams

  • and is from the chapter outlines.
  • The the answers can be found online.
  • His mid-terms are insane!

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

31

Recent reviews read by the AI

31

Lifetime ratings

86/100

Evidence confidence

The rating is based on 31 reviews across many years and courses, with consistent , and mixed teaching quality.

Inside 31 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 512
4 out of 55
3 out of 53
2 out of 54
1 out of 57

Course coverage

KPET20110 reviews
HLTH1004 reviews
HEALTH1003 reviews
HLHSCI1003 reviews
KPEA1252 reviews
Show 8 more courses
PE1022 reviews
HLTHSCI1001 review
HLTHSCIENCE1 review
KPEA101B1 review
KPEA1301 review
KPEI1521 review
KPEI2011 review
PE1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

10 reported outcomes

A range

8

A+ 2 · A 6

B range

1

B 1

C range

1

C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values