AI Rate Professor

Science

Camilo Mejia Prada

ASTRON101L · 1 lifetime ratings

AI rating
19/100
RMP rating
2.0/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
5.0

The decision

Avoid unless you are prepared for , and a .

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerConfusing InstructionTough GraderHeavy WorkloadMessy Midterm
  • The only review describes the class as confusing and poorly run.
  • The student reports harsh or and projects.
  • The as excessive and disorganized.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

MissionImpossible

15/100

The , and excessive midterm work, making an A feel very hard.

The evidence comes only from one in-person review, with .

Is the course easy?

BrainBurner

12/100

The course sounds intellectually and operationally difficult because the lab guidance and and overloaded.

The evidence comes .

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

The review does not clearly .

No online evidence exists, and the .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

8/100

The only student explicitly warns others and gives a negative account of , and workload.

The recommendation evidence comes .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

12/100

The review reports tough grading and says the instructor graded his own work incorrectly.

Format shift

Only one in-person review supports this, and there is .

Workload

Overwhelming

10/100

The review mentions group projects, many papers, and a .

Format shift

Only the in-person review provides workload evidence.

Teaching experience

Poor

24/100

The instructor is described as and inconsistent while .

Format shift

, so confidence is limited.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

The , and a midterm, suggesting mixed assessment types.

Format shift

Only the in-person review describes assessments, and no online evidence exists.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

The single in-person review is strongly negative, , and an overloaded midterm.

Main concern

The and much harder than expected.

What students said

“This class was honestly ridiculous.”
ASTRON-101L
“ while working through lab, but will grade his own work incorrectly.”
ASTRON-101L
“the and far too much work.”
ASTRON-101L

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

The only exam evidence says the and far too much work, with .

Difficult MidtermHeavy Workload

Assessment risk

Strict

18/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

The mess and far too much work, but does not prove book policy, proctoring, or .

Difficult MidtermHeavy Workload
“the and far too much work.”
ASTRON-101L

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“This class was honestly ridiculous.”

Voice snapshots generated from 1 review, highlighting key themes in , and . Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

24/100

“ while working through lab, but will grade his own work incorrectly.”

⚖️

12/100

“will grade his own work incorrectly.”

🧪

18/100

“the and far too much work.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • while working through lab, but will grade his own work incorrectly.
  • If

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty And Grades

  • This class was honestly ridiculous.
  • the and far too much work.

Theme 3

📝 About Workload

  • save the * .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

1

Recent reviews read by the AI

1

Lifetime ratings

25/100

Evidence confidence

The rating is based , so the negative pattern is serious but not broadly confirmed.

Inside 1 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 50

Course coverage

ASTRON-101L1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values