AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Beverly Gunderson

MATH140 · MATH211 · MATH214 · 6 lifetime ratings

AI rating
71/100
RMP rating
3.8/5
Take again
66.67%
Difficulty
3.3

The decision

Take her if you value a , but if you need slow pacing or highly polished lectures.

Best fit · Beginner FriendlyCaring helpClear when paced wellFast pacedTest heavyMixed by course
  • Most reviews describe Gunderson as kind, patient, and helpful with questions.
  • MATH140 and MATH214 reviews warn about .
  • Grades can be reachable, but students may need steady practice and outside support.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

62/100

An A is possible with , and practice, but reviews mention no in one course and enough difficulty to keep it from being effortless.

Online evidence is more mixed because MATH140 reports no extra credit, while in person includes one A with .

Is the course easy?

Standard

52/100

The course content , but fast pacing and lengthy notes make some sections challenging.

Online reviews include the clearest warning about fast pacing, while in person reviews are sharply split by course.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

25/100

One review explicitly warns that skipping class means you will not pass, and the comments .

The strongest attendance warning comes from an online MATH140 review, with .

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

67/100

and help, but serious course-specific complaints lower confidence.

Online reviews are mostly supportive with one major pace concern, while in person reviews include both strong praise and a .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

58/100

Grading appears fair with some in one section, but .

Format shift

Online includes a no-extra-credit warning, while in person includes an extra-credit tag and an A outcome.

Workload

Moderate

48/100

Homework and lengthy notes appear meaningful but not uniformly overwhelming.

Format shift

Online MATH140 and in person MATH214 mention heavy work, while MATH211 reviews focus more on support.

Teaching experience

Good

72/100

She is often described as caring and clear, but the MATH214 review reports poor lecture delivery.

Format shift

Online teaching feedback is mostly positive except fast pacing, while in .

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

72/100

Reviews repeatedly mention tests and and notes used as preparation.

Format shift

Online reviews mention tests and , while in .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In person evidence and one severe complaint about reading from slides.

Main concern

Lecture quality may vary sharply by course.

What students said

“She is knowledgeable about the subject and way that is easy to digest.”
MATH140
“Useless class and professor. .”
MATH214

Remote format

Online

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

Online reviews are mostly positive about help and access, but one MATH140 review says the pace is too fast and .

Main concern

Fast pacing can hurt slower learners.

What students said

“ and .”
MATH211
“She moves way too fast for anyone to properly digest and learn the material.”
MATH140

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams seem standard to somewhat demanding, with strict proctoring policies.

Test HeavyCovered Material On TestsPop Quizzes Mentioned

Assessment risk

Standard

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In person reviews mention test-heavy coursework but do not clearly prove the .

Test Heavy
“Test heavy”
MATH214

Online

Online reviews mention tests, exams, and pop quizzes, but .

Tests Match Covered MaterialPop Quizzes Mentioned
“Was really good about making sure what was on the .”
MATH211
“Beware of pop quizzes”
MATH140

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ idiots to understand which was basically me.”

Voice snapshots generated from 6 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and course fit. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

72/100

“ idiots to understand which was basically me.”

👍 Recommendation Level

67/100

“ .”

⚠️ Pace Risk

52/100

“She moves way too fast for anyone to properly digest and learn the material.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • and .
  • She's very receptive of questions and
  • She is knowledgeable about the subject and way that is easy to digest.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Utilize the TLC as much as you can to get good grades because she doesn't give .
  • The notes are also very lengthy and most times they don't make sense.

Theme 3

⚠️ About Course Fit

  • if you're a slow learner.
  • Useless class and professor. .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

6

Recent reviews read by the AI

6

Lifetime ratings

63/100

Evidence confidence

Six reviews across several years give useful but course-dependent evidence with mixed signals.

Inside 6 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 54
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 51

Course coverage

MATH2113 reviews
MATH1402 reviews
MATH2141 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

6 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

3

B+ 1 · B 2

C range

1

C+ 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not sure yet 1