AI Rate Professor

Graphic Arts

Omid Orouji

GMD144 · 3 lifetime ratings

AI rating
29/100
RMP rating
2.0/5
Take again
33.33%
Difficulty
4.0

The decision

if you can handle blunt critique and independent problem solving; .

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerHarsh critiquesConfusing assignmentsDetailed feedbackStrict gradingLow empathy
  • In-person reviews are strongly , and lack of empathy.
  • The single online review is positive and .
  • The overall experience is risky because and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

38/100

An A is possible, but comments , and penalties that make the grade feel costly.

The online review does not address grades clearly, while .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

32/100

The course feels difficult mainly because assignment expectations and .

Online evidence frames the challenge as detailed critique, while as confusion and poor guidance.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

18/100

In-person evidence says attention or .

The ; the online review does not clearly describe attendance policy.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

34/100

Recommendation is split, but the majority of reviews are severe warnings about harshness, confusion, and lack of useful support.

The one online review recommends him, while .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

18/100

, and harsh critiques.

Format shift

; the online review praises accuracy but not leniency.

Workload

Heavy

34/100

The workload burden comes less from quantity and more from strict expectations, critiques, and .

Format shift

, while the online review only describes detailed critique.

Teaching experience

Poor

35/100

He may have expertise, but most reviews , and not helpful.

Format shift

Online feedback is positive about expertise, while and support.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

20/100

Reviews focus on projects, assignments, and critique rather than exams.

Format shift

Both formats discuss critique or .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

as , and unhelpful during critiques.

Main concern

Students report unclear assignments, harsh critique, and .

What students said

“ and ”
GMD-144
“he took off half ”
GMD-144

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

The lone online review praises his talent, accuracy, detail, and insights despite an intimidating style.

Main concern

He can be intimidating and critical.

What students said

“Sometimes he can be critical, however he is always accurate.”
GMD-144
“He has great talent and is incredibly detailed.”
GMD-144

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove .

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

The policy.

Online

The online review does .

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“He is extremely confusing and students don't do assignments correctly.”

Voice snapshots generated from 3 reviews, highlighting conflicting online and , and teaching clarity. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

35/100

“I learned nothing in his class.”

⚖️

18/100

“he took off half ”

🧠

34/100

“He has great talent and is incredibly detailed.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • and
  • and .
  • Sometimes he can be critical, however he is always accurate.

Theme 2

⚖️

  • Extremely harsh w critiques
  • He is also very harsh during critique time.
  • I was still turning in everything on time and great quality

Theme 3

❤️ About Classroom Experience

  • had some mental crisis emergencies and he absolutely had no human empathy.
  • At first I found him intimidating.
  • Some students lock horns with him.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

3

Recent reviews read by the AI

3

Lifetime ratings

44/100

Evidence confidence

, and the online and in-person experiences conflict sharply.

Inside 3 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 52

Course coverage

GMD-1443 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values