AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Amy Hildrew

MATH130 · STATS101 · 12 lifetime ratings

AI rating
23/100
RMP rating
2.1/5
Take again
25%
Difficulty
2.8

The decision

unless you are comfortable , and working with minimal support.

Best fit · Self Taught ProSelf-teaching requiredStrict proctoringRude communicationTest heavyUnclear wording
  • Most online students say the class relies on textbook or module learning with limited direct teaching.
  • Many students describe rude communication, low flexibility, and weak support.
  • Tests are central and several comments mention proctoring, timed exams, no notes, no calculator, or .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

52/100

Some students earned high grades and one called her an , but , and self-teaching make the A far from effortless.

Online reviews contain most grade evidence and are mixed; the .

Is the course easy?

Standard

45/100

The material can be basic, but , and limited help make it feel harder than expected.

Online reviews say basics can be easy but delivery is poor, while the .

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

22/100

, and students describe low flexibility around technical or life issues.

The strict flexibility evidence comes from online reviews; the policy.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

25/100

Most students do not recommend her because , and frustrated by strict testing and communication.

Online reviews are mostly negative despite a few positive outliers, and the .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

30/100

Some students earned A-range grades, but , and little flexibility.

Format shift

Online reviews drive the ; the in-person review is negative but .

Workload

Heavy

28/100

Students mention lots of , and .

Format shift

Online reviews provide repeated workload complaints, while the .

Teaching experience

Poor

25/100

Most students , and leaves students to teach themselves.

Format shift

Both formats are negative, but the evidence is much stronger online because it has 11 reviews.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

82/100

Students repeatedly say tests are the main weight, with , and textbook work supporting them.

Format shift

Online reviews clearly show a test-heavy structure, while the .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

The and says she was rude, unhelpful, and assigned busy work.

Main concern

There is , but it reports no useful teaching support.

What students said

“She doesnt teach at all and only assigns busy work.”
STATS101
“She is so rude and very unhelpful.”
STATS101

Remote format

Online

11 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews are mostly negative, describing self-teaching, strict testing, poor communication, and limited flexibility.

Main concern

Students often say lectures are just textbook material and .

What students said

“Lectures are video modules where she just reads off the textbook.”
MATH130
“The and proctored.”
MATH130
“basically doing everything on your own.”
MATH130

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Online reviews clearly as no scratch paper, calculator, or notes.

Timed TestsProctored TestsNo Scratch PaperNo Calculator Or NotesAllotted Test Time

Assessment risk

Strict

18/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

The policy.

Online

Online reviews describe timed and , and restrictions such as no scratch paper, calculator, or notes.

Timed TestsProctored TestsNo Scratch PaperNo Calculator Or NotesAllotted Test Time
“The and proctored.”
MATH130
“She makes you use proctor”
MATH130
“ !!!”
MATH130
“ , but no calculator or notes allowed!!!”
MATH130

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“The and proctored. if you can't teach yourself.”

Voice snapshots generated from 12 reviews, highlighting major themes in , and workload. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

25/100

“Lectures are video modules where she just reads off the textbook.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

25/100

“ ”

🧪

18/100

“The and proctored.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • basically doing everything on your own.
  • She doesnt teach at all and only assigns busy work.
  • .
  • She provided her own textbook and genuinely wants you to learn.

Theme 2

🧪 About Tests

  • The and proctored.
  • The only mandatory part of the class was that .
  • !!!
  • , but no calculator or notes allowed!!!

Theme 3

📨 About Communication

  • Was not communicating too much, unprofessional emails, very rude during certain times.
  • Her emails back to students were so passive aggressive
  • She is not considerate or flexible.
  • Awesome professor and understands life happens and cares for her students.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

12

Recent reviews read by the AI

12

Lifetime ratings

88/100

Evidence confidence

Twelve reviews, mostly from the same course and period, show strong , and poor communication.

Inside 12 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 51
3 out of 52
2 out of 52
1 out of 56

Course coverage

MATH13011 reviews
STATS1011 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

10 reported outcomes

A range

4

A+ 1 · A 1 · A- 2

B range

4

B+ 3 · B 1

C range

1

C+ 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Drop/Withdrawal 1