AI Rate Professor

Anthropology

Amanda Zunner-Keating

ANTHRO102 · ANTHRO1031872 · ANTHRO101 · ANTHRO121 · ANTHRO220 · ANTHRO103 · ANTHRO101LAB · 63 lifetime ratings

AI rating
100/100
RMP rating
4.8/5
Take again
91.38%
Difficulty
2.0

The decision

if you want a supportive, engaging professor and can keep up with .

Best fit · Effort For RewardCaring ProfessorExtra Credit HeavyLate Work FriendlyEngaging LecturesHomework Heavy
  • Students overwhelmingly describe her as , and unusually supportive.
  • Grades are very attainable because of , and lenient grading.
  • The main , and short-term course pacing.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

WalkInThePark

93/100

Getting an A is very easy for students who submit work because she offers major , accepts late work, and grades generously.

Online reviews are especially easy-A focused, while but more workload complaints.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

75/100

The and engaging, though readings, assignments, and short-term pacing can make the course feel busy.

Online courses feel more accessible and organized, while because some students report rushed lectures and .

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

70/100

, but reviews emphasize flexibility with late work and support rather than strict attendance penalties.

Online evidence focuses on flexible deadlines, while and class sessions matter.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

94/100

Students recommend her because , and unusually committed to helping students succeed.

Both online and slightly more enthusiastic about accessibility and grade flexibility.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Generous

96/100

Reviews repeatedly mention full-credit late , and many A grades.

Format shift

Online reviews show the strongest grading leniency, while concerns.

Workload

Moderate

52/100

The work is often manageable but not light, with frequent mentions of , and busy short-term pacing.

Format shift

Online students often call the work accessible, while .

Teaching experience

Excellent

96/100

Students describe her as , and deeply invested in student success.

Format shift

Teaching praise is strong across both formats, though a small number of .

Assessment method

Balanced

48/100

Assessment appears to mix , and some straightforward tests.

Format shift

Online reviews emphasize assignments and quizzes, while , and class activities.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

32 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

, but they show more mixed workload experiences and a few complaints about busy work and rushed lectures.

Main concern

Some students found the workload excessive or the lectures rushed.

What students said

“if you do the work, you will get a good grade.”
ANTHRO1031872
“ unless ”
ANTHRO103
“The .”
ANTHRO103

Remote format

Online

18 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Easy A Hunter

Online reviews are extremely positive, highlighting accessible course design, late-work flexibility, , and caring communication.

Main concern

The main concern is keeping up with readings and .

What students said

“ .”
ANTHRO103
“More ”
ANTHRO103
“one of the .”
ANTHRO101LAB

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews describe tests as easy or straightforward, but they do not clearly prove open-book, webcam, Lockdown Browser, or proctoring policies.

Straightforward TestsEasy TestsReview GamesNo Clear Proctoring Evidence

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

82/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews mention straightforward and easy exams, but do not clearly prove closed-book rules or .

Straightforward TestsEasy ExamsNo Clear Policy Evidence
“The .”
ANTHRO103
“ and is an .”
ANTHRO101LAB

Online

Online reviews mention easy tests and quiz review help, but do not clearly prove open-book rules, webcam use, Lockdown Browser, or proctoring.

Easy TestsReview GamesNo Clear Proctoring Evidence
“ .”
ANTHRO103
“We had review games which helped a .”
ANTHRO1031872

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ .”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and format differences. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

96/100

“Amanda is the the .”

🎁

96/100

“doesn't care how late something is tuned in, you'll get full credit.”

📚 Workload Reality

52/100

“The work is a lot, but not overbearing as long as you pace yourself accordingly.”

Theme 1

❤️ About Support & Care

  • She recognizes that life outside of school happens and she works with you.
  • She is very encouraging and makes the material fun and engaging .
  • she accepts late work and you can text her whenever you are confused or need help with an assignment.

Theme 2

📈 About Grades & Flexibility

  • More ; doesn't care how late something is tuned in, you'll get full credit.
  • There is PLENTY of
  • Really nice and easy teacher. Gives a lot of and allows you to make up your work till the end of the semester.

Theme 3

📚 About Workload

  • , and quizzes...
  • She does give a lot of work, but she accepts all late work, which helped a lot.
  • Group work and , but overall the

Theme 4

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She makes the coursework very intriguing.
  • Her class is so fun, but you also learn a lot.
  • She but beside that and is an easy grader.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

63

Lifetime ratings

94/100

Evidence confidence

The rating is based on 50 reviews across online and in-person formats with detailed, consistent praise and .

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 558
4 out of 50
3 out of 51
2 out of 52
1 out of 52

Course coverage

ANTHRO103187220 reviews
ANTHRO10310 reviews
ANTHRO101LAB7 reviews
ANTHRO2207 reviews
ANTHRO1023 reviews
Show 2 more courses
ANTHRO1212 reviews
ANTHRO1011 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

40 reported outcomes

A range

36

A+ 19 · A 15 · A- 2

B range

3

B+ 1 · B 2

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not sure yet 1