AI Rate Professor

Chemistry

David Amiel

CHEM151 · CHEM201 · CHEM202 · CHEM48076 · 13 lifetime ratings

AI rating
50/100
RMP rating
2.8/5
Take again
53.85%
Difficulty
3.5

The decision

if you can learn chemistry independently and handle an inconsistent classroom style.

Best fit · Self Taught ProDisorganized lecturesPolarizing personalityHilarious but inconsistentSelf-study neededForgiving grading moments
  • Students are sharply split between inspired fans and students who felt dismissed or confused.
  • Many reviews say lectures can be vague or disorganized, so independent study matters.
  • Grades can be workable, but tests and chemistry content still require real studying.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

56/100

An A is possible through participation, , and persistence, but several students needed heavy self-study or .

Online evidence includes easy assignments and outside-video dependence, while , and hard tests.

Is the course easy?

Standard

42/100

Chemistry content and exams are not easy, and than the material alone.

Both formats report clarity problems, though one online and assignments were easy.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

55/100

Reviews mention participation mattering but do not clearly prove a .

In-person reviews mention participation more often, while .

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

52/100

Recommendation depends heavily on learning style because students either praise his humor and inspiration or .

Online reviews lean more negative except one strong positive, while .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

58/100

Grading has lenient moments , and participation boosts, but and tough-grader tags appear too.

Format shift

Online reviews mention easy assignments and , while in-person reviews mention both forgiving participation and .

Workload

Moderate

47/100

Homework, labs, reading, and on the course.

Format shift

Online students mention outside videos and easy assignments, while and study groups.

Teaching experience

Average

48/100

His teaching is inconsistent because some students find him funny and inspiring while many describe vague, rude, or .

Format shift

Online reviews include the harshest teaching complaints, while .

Assessment method

Balanced

58/100

Assessment appears to mix homework, labs, recitation sets, participation, tests, and .

Format shift

Online reviews emphasize assignments, while , and finals.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

10 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person reviews are polarized, with some students calling him inspiring and others describing vague lectures and poor responses to questions.

Main concern

and .

What students said

“He isn't the , but I was still able to figure out most things myself with the help of friends.”
CHEM151
“Was super vague when explaining lectures and skipped over a lot.”
CHEM151
“ ”
CHEM202

Remote format

Online

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews are highly mixed, with but two students saying the .

Main concern

Online students may need outside videos or .

What students said

“I got a good grade but I had to watch a ton of youtube videos.”
CHEM151
“He failed to teach us. .”
CHEM201
“ and cover the subject matter adequately.”
CHEM48076

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

but one in-person review explicitly mentioning an open-book or .

Hard TestsOpen Book Final MentionedTest Heavy MentionedGraded By Few Things

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and one open book or notes final, but do not clearly prove a .

Hard TestsOpen Book Final MentionedTest Heavy Mentioned
“ but okay if you study.”
CHEM201
“ ”
CHEM201
“Test heavy”
CHEM151

Online

Online reviews do not clearly prove webcam, proctoring, open-book, midterm, or .

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“He isn't the , but I was still able to figure out most things myself with the help of friends.”

Voice snapshots generated from 13 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and student fit. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

48/100

“He failed to teach us. .”

👍 Recommendation Split

52/100

“ .”

📚

42/100

“I got a good grade but I had to watch a ton of youtube videos.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Really .
  • Super chill prof.
  • Worthless lectures.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • I participated a lot and he gave me an A instead.
  • HW was
  • but okay if you study.
  • and is time consuming

Theme 3

❤️ About Classroom Fit

  • If you are the type of student who needs an attentive professor he is not for you.
  • He is also hilarious and you will get along amazingly with him.
  • .
  • Loved this guy! I switched my major because of him.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

13

Recent reviews read by the AI

13

Lifetime ratings

82/100

Evidence confidence

Thirteen reviews across several years give enough detail, but the highly polarized tone limits certainty.

Inside 13 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 53
4 out of 52
3 out of 52
2 out of 51
1 out of 55

Course coverage

CHEM1515 reviews
CHEM2015 reviews
CHEM2022 reviews
CHEM480761 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

6 reported outcomes

A range

3

A 2 · A- 1

B range

2

B+ 2

C range

1

C- 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values