AI Rate Professor

Economics

. Templer

MACRO · ECON202 · ECONHIST170 · HIS · ECONHISTORY · ECON170 · ECON130 · ECON201H · ECONOMICS · HST270 · ECON · ECON2012 · HIST170 · ECON201 · 52 lifetime ratings

AI rating
18/100
RMP rating
2.5/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
3.8

The decision

Avoid unless you are prepared for , and a lot of self-management.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerHard testsHeavy workloadUnclear lecturesStrict gradingPolarizing but mostly negative
  • Most students describe the class as .
  • There is some evidence of and learnable material, but many reviews say the effort is high and support is weak.
  • Attendance and consistent work appear important because missing class or deadlines can sink the grade.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

32/100

A good grade is possible with consistent work, , and studying, but , and heavy assignments.

Online evidence is too limited and , while and workload make the A difficult.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

30/100

Economics and history content are , and heavy reading or writing demands.

The single online and poor timing, while in-person reviews strongly support a challenging course experience.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

18/100

Students explicitly warn that missing class can prevent passing, and the course relies on lectures, quizzes, and deadlines.

In-person evidence supports strict attendance importance, while .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

22/100

Most students warn against taking her because the , and harshly graded.

Both formats are negative, but the because it contains nearly all reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

25/100

Many students report hard or , and limited curves, though some mention or dropped tests.

Format shift

Online evidence says homework was graded unfairly, while and strict grading.

Workload

Heavy

18/100

Reviews describe many , and serious studying.

Format shift

Online evidence is limited, while , essays, quizzes, and reading.

Teaching experience

Poor

30/100

Students often describe lectures as , and unsupportive, despite a minority calling her knowledgeable or helpful.

Format shift

Online evidence starts positive but ends with poor support, while strong positives.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

78/100

The course appears exam-heavy, with frequent mentions of , and essays tied to exams.

Format shift

Online evidence mentions homework and final review problems, while , and essays.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

49 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person reviews repeatedly describe hard tests, unclear lectures, heavy work, and a frustrating classroom tone, despite some praise for knowledge and .

Main concern

Students often struggle with , and .

What students said

“ UNLESS YOU WANT WEEKS OF HELL”
ECON202
“hard class. if you don't show up you will not pass.”
ECON170
“ taken.”
ECON202

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

The one online review says she began organized and helpful but and posted final review material too late.

Main concern

Online support and .

What students said

“She grades the .”
ECON202
“ .”
ECON202

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

, and often essay-heavy tests, with no clear proof of open-book or lenient proctoring except isolated homework quizzes.

Hard TestsConfusing Multiple ChoiceEssay QuestionsComprehensive FinalNo Clear Study Guides

Assessment risk

Strict

24/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews repeatedly describe hard , and weak study guidance, with one honors review mentioning open notes and .

Hard TestsConfusing Multiple ChoiceEssay QuestionsOpen Notes Homework QuizzesNo Study Guides
“ .”
ECON170
“there are no study guides.”
ECON202
“the and book.”
ECON201H
“comprehensive final w/4 long essays.”
ECON201

Online

The online review says the but does not clearly prove webcam, proctoring, open-book, or .

Late Final Review
“didn't post the review for the taken it.”
ECON202

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ UNLESS YOU WANT WEEKS OF HELL”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and grading. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

30/100

“She talks and talks and talks about her own opinions.”

⚖️

25/100

“She grades the .”

📝

24/100

“ taken.”

Theme 1

📝 About Exams

  • .
  • taken.
  • and long essays.
  • Very tricky on the tests.

Theme 2

📚 About Workload

  • So many papers
  • There are LOTS of deadlines
  • 20hrs of video to watch,20qizs,4tests w/16 shrt answr essays,35+ articles to read
  • do the .

Theme 3

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Stay far away from her.
  • She lectures and it doesn't really match up with the chapters/ .
  • She is one of the .
  • The subject is hard, but she breaks down the material item by item.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

52

Lifetime ratings

94/100

Evidence confidence

Fifty reviews over a long span provide extensive detail, and the negative themes are repeated often despite some conflicting positive reviews.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 59
4 out of 53
3 out of 513
2 out of 515
1 out of 512

Course coverage

ECON20215 reviews
ECON20114 reviews
ECON1707 reviews
HIST1703 reviews
ECON2 reviews
Show 9 more courses
ECON1301 review
ECON20121 review
ECON201H1 review
ECONHIST1701 review
ECONHISTORY1 review
ECONOMICS1 review
HIS1 review
HST2701 review
MACRO1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

4 reported outcomes

A range

3

A 3

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

1

D- 1

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values