AI Rate Professor

English

Bola King-Rushing

ENGL103 · ENGL101 · ENG101 · ENG103 · ENG101ENG103 · 15 lifetime ratings

AI rating
100/100
RMP rating
4.8/5
Take again
100%
Difficulty
2.1

The decision

if you want a supportive English professor with , and a writing-heavy but low-risk course.

Best fit · Easy A HunterCaring and AccessibleGenerous Extra CreditClear FeedbackFun DiscussionsMany Papers
  • Students overwhelmingly describe him as caring, engaging, and one of .
  • Grades are very reachable because , and clear expectations reduce risk.
  • The main workload is repeated writing, but students generally find the and worthwhile.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

WalkInThePark

96/100

Getting an A appears very easy if students complete the , and and flexibility.

Both formats support an easy-A profile, with online reviews stressing late-work flexibility and and .

Is the course easy?

Introductory

86/100

The writing workload is real, but students describe the , and expectations as approachable and enjoyable.

Online students mention four essays and discussions, while in-person students mention papers plus engaging class conversations.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

70/100

Participation matters in some reviews, but comments .

Online evidence centers on discussions and access, while strict attendance penalties.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

99/100

Students almost universally recommend him because , and .

Both online and in-person reviews are strongly positive, with in-person comments especially enthusiastic.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Generous

96/100

Students repeatedly mention , clear criteria, late-work flexibility, and very high grade outcomes.

Format shift

Online reviews emphasize full-credit late work and , while and generous grade support.

Workload

Moderate

62/100

The course requires multiple essays and some readings, but students usually call the work manageable for English.

Format shift

Both formats involve writing, with online reviews naming four essays and .

Teaching experience

Excellent

98/100

Students describe him as , and unusually memorable as a teacher.

Format shift

Online reviews highlight responsiveness and feedback, while , and classroom energy.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

20/100

, and writing assignments rather than exams.

Format shift

Both formats focus on papers and writing tasks, with .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

10 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Easy A Hunter

In-person reviews are extremely enthusiastic, emphasizing , and easy grades with .

Main concern

Students should expect regular essays and .

What students said

“Its literally impossible to get anything lower than a B in this class.”
ENG103
“ .”
ENGL103

Remote format

Online

5 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Easy A Hunter

Online reviews praise his email access, essay feedback, , late-work flexibility, and manageable writing expectations.

Main concern

He can be slow with announcements or .

What students said

“ and allowed for me to turn in work late for full credit.”
ENGL103
“There is no way to fail unless iou deliberately try.”
ENG101

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

because reviews emphasize essays and , but policies are not fully detailed.

Easy FinalWriting-Based AssessmentNo Clear Proctoring Evidence

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

88/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews mention an easy final and .

Easy FinalWriting-Based Assessment
“A lot of , so make sure to make time to write those. Super fun prof and ”
ENG103

Online

Online reviews do not clearly .

Writing-Based AssessmentNo Clear Proctoring Evidence
“4 essays, online discussions, in-class timed writing, thought provoking lectures.”
ENG101

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ . 101 or 103, doesn't matter which.”

Voice snapshots generated from 15 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and support. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

98/100

“ .”

🎁 Grade Support

96/100

“There is no way to fail unless iou deliberately try.”

📝 Workload Reality

62/100

“A lot of , so make sure to make time to write those.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • He is very warm and welcoming as well as supportive.
  • He won't ever fail to engage you in his lectures.
  • Super fun prof and

Theme 2

📈 About Grades and Work

  • and allowed for me to turn in work late for full credit.
  • Tons of EC & opportunities to share your opinion throughout the semester.
  • Its literally impossible to get anything lower than a B in this class.

Theme 3

❤️ About Student Support

  • He actually cares about his students, shares real experiences with his students & .
  • .
  • If you want to succeed in this class he will help you in everyway possible.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

15

Recent reviews read by the AI

15

Lifetime ratings

92/100

Evidence confidence

Fifteen reviews across online and , and strongly positive over several years.

Inside 15 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 512
4 out of 53
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

ENG1016 reviews
ENG1034 reviews
ENGL1033 reviews
ENG101ENG1031 review
ENGL1011 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

13 reported outcomes

A range

12

A+ 5 · A 6 · A- 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not sure yet 1