AI Rate Professor

English

Eunha Jung

ENG091 · ENGLISH103 · ENGL103 · ENGLISH91 · ENG101 · ENGL101 · EGL101 · ENG103 · 21 lifetime ratings

AI rating
73/100
RMP rating
4.0/5
Take again
80.95%
Difficulty
3.1

The decision

if you can keep up with reading and essays and want a fair, caring professor who rewards steady effort.

Best fit · Effort For RewardCaring but DemandingLots of ReadingEssay HeavyClear CriteriaSlow Grading
  • Most students recommend her because , and clear about writing expectations.
  • The course is not effortless because reading, essays, and .
  • Online reviews are more , and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

68/100

As are common and sometimes easy for decent writers, but the , and attention to requirements.

Online reviews include one easy-A claim but also slow-feedback problems, while .

Is the course easy?

Standard

58/100

The course is understandable and often well structured, but , and tough paper standards keep it from being truly easy.

Online reviews vary from very easy to homework-heavy, while but and essay demands.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

55/100

Reviews , but participation and lectures are repeatedly tied to doing well.

In-person reviews give the main participation evidence, while online and communication.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

78/100

Most students recommend her because , and helpful, though and tough essays create hesitation.

, while online reviews are split by communication and .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

55/100

Students often earn As, but many describe her as a and follows stated requirements.

Format shift

Online grading can feel easy for strong writers but slow, while as fair but not lenient.

Workload

Moderate

45/100

The , and occasional tests, with heavier pressure in short sessions.

Format shift

Online reviews stress reading and weekly work, while and participation.

Teaching experience

Good

80/100

Most students , and engaging, though a few report unhelpful lectures or weak responsiveness.

Format shift

and classroom support more strongly, while online reviews are and grading.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

30/100

Assessment is , and staged writing assignments, with only limited test mentions.

Format shift

Both formats are writing-centered, with online reviews mentioning discussion boards and a couple tests and .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

16 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews are mostly positive, , and essay guidance despite tough grading and lots of reading.

Main concern

Students should expect essays, reading, participation, and .

What students said

“There were 4 major essays and lots of reading but she works with you if you pay attention and participate in class.”
ENGL101
“The requirements are pretty straightforward and the work for a good grade and I personally love that!”
EGL101

Remote format

Online

5 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Online reviews are mixed but generally workable, with easy writing tasks for prepared students and and communication.

Main concern

and delayed responses can make planning and revisions harder.

What students said

“Fully online section was very easy, do the and get an easy A if you're a decent writer.”
ENGL103
“Takes a very long time to grade stuff.”
ENG103

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exam risk appears moderate to low because assessment is mostly writing-based and one final allowed a study guide, but .

Study Guide FinalCouple TestsWriting-Based AssessmentNo Clear Proctoring Evidence

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

74/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and include one multiple-choice final using a study guide, with no clear closed-book policy evidence.

Study Guide FinalWriting-Based Assessment
“ but you can use your study guide on it”
ENG101

Online

Online reviews mention only a couple tests and do not .

Couple TestsNo Clear Proctoring Evidence
“There are , and only a couple tests.”
ENGL101

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“If and writing, this is the professor for you!”

Voice snapshots generated from 21 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and online communication. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

80/100

“She made the learning environment fun and enjoyable with her jokes and discussions.”

📚 Workload Reality

45/100

“There were 4 major essays and lots of reading but she works with you if you pay attention and participate in class.”

⚖️

55/100

“The requirements are pretty straightforward and the work for a good grade and I personally love that!”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Professor Jung was a great professor, she was funny and cares about her students.
  • Her lectures were incredible!
  • She made the learning environment fun and enjoyable with her jokes and discussions.

Theme 2

📝 About Reading and Essays

  • There were 4 major essays and lots of reading but she works with you if you pay attention and participate in class.
  • One paper but semester.
  • Fully online section was very easy, do the and get an easy A if you're a decent writer.

Theme 3

⏳ About Online Friction

  • , but otherwise a great professor.
  • Takes a very long time to grade stuff.
  • .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

21

Recent reviews read by the AI

21

Lifetime ratings

90/100

Evidence confidence

Twenty-one reviews across online and in-person formats provide detailed and mostly consistent , and communication.

Inside 21 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 510
4 out of 56
3 out of 52
2 out of 51
1 out of 52

Course coverage

ENG1015 reviews
ENG1035 reviews
ENGL1035 reviews
ENGL1012 reviews
EGL1011 review
Show 3 more courses
ENG0911 review
ENGLISH1031 review
ENGLISH911 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

19 reported outcomes

A range

14

A+ 5 · A 8 · A- 1

B range

4

B+ 2 · B 2

C range

1

C- 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values