AI Rate Professor

English

Jessica Small

ENGLISH101 · ENGL103 · ENGL101 · ENG101 · ENG103 · ENG101ENG103 · 34 lifetime ratings

AI rating
91/100
RMP rating
4.8/5
Take again
93.94%
Difficulty
3.1

The decision

if you want a but usually rewards consistent effort.

Best fit · Effort For RewardExcellent FeedbackReading HeavyParticipation MattersCaring TeacherTough But Fair
  • , and ability to improve writing.
  • The , and quizzes, so it is not a slack-off course.
  • Grades are usually strong when students keep up, but .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

72/100

An A is realistic with , and revisions, but and workload prevent it from being effortless.

Online reviews mention and participation points, while in-person , and attendance.

Is the course easy?

Standard

55/100

The writing topics are often manageable, but the course , and feedback-driven revision.

Both formats describe manageable content with real workload, though online students more often warn not to underestimate it.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

38/100

Participation is a major part of success, and several reviews warn that skipping class hurts the grade.

and participation, while online reviews emphasize active class participation.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

92/100

Students recommend her because , and makes English feel worthwhile.

Both online and online and in-person cautions about workload and grading.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

58/100

She is usually seen as fair and clear, but many students call her a .

Format shift

Online reviews explicitly call her tough, while dates and demanding essay feedback.

Workload

Moderate

45/100

Workload is steady, with , and three to four essays.

Format shift

Both formats report substantial reading and writing, with online reviews also mentioning weekly posts and group assignments.

Teaching experience

Excellent

94/100

Students consistently describe her as , and .

Format shift

Teaching praise is strong in both formats, especially for feedback and engagement.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

25/100

Grades appear driven , and participation rather than major exams.

Format shift

Both formats focus on writing assignments and participation, with .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

30 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews are , and improvement, with repeated warnings about reading and essays.

Main concern

Students must keep up with , and multiple essays.

What students said

“ . .”
ENG101
“This isn't a class to slack off on.”
ENG101
“She makes you work hard, but genuinely wants to help you improve your writing skills.”
ENG103

Remote format

Online

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

, and clear expectations, but still warn about reading, essays, and tough grading.

Main concern

Online students may underestimate the workload and .

What students said

“do not underestimate her.”
ENGLISH101
“Overall I made the right choice taking this professor.”
ENG103
“ and she is a .”
ENG103

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews clearly mention quizzes, essays, and participation, but do not clearly prove a .

Reading QuizzesPop QuizzesEssay HeavyParticipation Points

Assessment risk

Varies

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, journals, and participation, but do not clearly prove a midterm, final, open-book, or closed-book exam policy.

Reading QuizzesPop QuizzesEssaysParticipation Points
“There are at least 10 reading quizzes, very short, and 4 essays”
ENG101
“be , and .”
ENG101

Online

Online reviews mention essays, participation, reading, posts, and group work, but do not clearly .

EssaysParticipation PointsWeekly Posts
“There are , which is weighed really heavily in your grade”
ENG103
“Opportunity for .”
ENGLISH101

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“She makes you work hard, but genuinely wants to help you improve your writing skills.”

Voice snapshots generated from 34 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and workload. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

94/100

“ so descriptive and .”

📚 Workload Reality

45/100

“This isn't a class to slack off on.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

92/100

“ . .”

Theme 1

👩‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • so far.
  • and she likes participation from her students
  • She truly cares about her students and you can tell she loves teaching.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Be prepared for and 3 essays.
  • and she is a .
  • Make the .

Theme 3

❤️ About Student Support

  • She really cares about teaching and wants every student to improve.
  • Do not be afraid to ask for help!
  • She is willing to help students as much as she can.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

34

Recent reviews read by the AI

34

Lifetime ratings

92/100

Evidence confidence

There are 34 reviews across many years and formats, with , and grading.

Inside 34 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 531
4 out of 51
3 out of 51
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

ENG10314 reviews
ENG10110 reviews
ENGL1015 reviews
ENGL1032 reviews
ENGLISH1012 reviews
Show 1 more courses
ENG101ENG1031 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

27 reported outcomes

A range

20

A+ 1 · A 18 · A- 1

B range

5

B+ 2 · B 3

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

2

Not sure yet 2