AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Edouard Tchertchian

MATH58 · MATH125 · MATH058 · 5 lifetime ratings

AI rating
69/100
RMP rating
4.1/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
2.8

The decision

He looks worthwhile for students who want patient math help, but the mixed and dated evidence makes the choice less certain.

Best fit · Beginner FriendlyClear explanationsCaring and approachableMath confidence builderHomework-heavyMixed recent feedback
  • Most older reviews praise him as , and helpful for students who struggle with math.
  • One recent review is extremely negative and lowers confidence in current performance.
  • The , but it is not a no-work easy A.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

68/100

An A is realistic when students do the homework and , but the course still requires steady effort.

because there are no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

66/100

Math content is made more understandable through examples and , but it is still work-heavy for some students.

All course .

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

Reviews do .

There are no online reviews, and policy.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

70/100

and caring math teaching, but one recent review strongly says to avoid him.

The and mixed by date.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

60/100

Grades can be strong with , but comments .

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

48/100

One student says the class was a lot of though it helped with tests.

Format shift

Only in-person reviews discuss workload.

Teaching experience

Good

78/100

, and approachability, but one review calls his teaching horrible.

Format shift

All teaching evidence is in-person and mostly positive with one sharp negative outlier.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

30/100

, while tests are mentioned less often.

Format shift

and tests; there is no online evidence.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

5 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

professor who helps weaker students, with one severe negative outlier.

Main concern

and one very negative recent review create risk.

What students said

“I have always been bad at math but he helped me so much!”
MATH58
“The !”
MATH125

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mention tests and pop quizzes, but they do not .

Tests MentionedPop Quizzes Mentioned

Assessment risk

Standard

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and pop quizzes, but do not clearly prove closed-book rules, proctoring, or .

TestsPop Quizzes
“ .”
MATH058
“Beware of pop quizzes”
MATH125

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“I have always been bad at math but he helped me so much!”

Voice snapshots generated from 5 , and conflicting recommendation signals. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

78/100

“ so well and clear.”

📚 Effort And Homework

68/100

“His class was a lot of work but if you do all the hw he assigns (he goes over some of it in class), you ace mos tests.”

⚠️

70/100

“The !”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • so well and clear.
  • he went over many examples and made it understandable.
  • He is very funny and approachable.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty And Grades

  • I actually got an A in his class and he really cared for his students.
  • His class was a lot of work but if you do all the hw he assigns (he goes over some of it in class), you ace mos tests.

Theme 3

⚠️ About Student Risk

  • The !
  • He is very horrible at teaching.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

5

Recent reviews read by the AI

5

Lifetime ratings

55/100

Evidence confidence

, and the newest review sharply conflicts with earlier positive comments.

Inside 5 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 54
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

MATH0582 reviews
MATH1252 reviews
MATH581 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

1

A+ 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

1

D+ 1

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values