AI Rate Professor

Chemistry

Tiehua Piao

CHEM151 · CHEM201 · 30 lifetime ratings

AI rating
39/100
RMP rating
2.5/5
Take again
50%
Difficulty
3.4

The decision

if you can learn independently and are willing to ask for help often.

Best fit · Self Taught ProCaring but unclearLecture heavyHeavy workloadAccent concernsSelf-study risk
  • Students often describe her as kind and willing to help, but many say lectures are .
  • Chemistry content and workload are consistently challenging, with , and studying needed.
  • Grading evidence is mixed, with some and passing help but also complaints about unclear or .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

38/100

An A or strong grade is possible, but most comments , and outside practice.

Online evidence is only one review and says the student struggled, while and mixed grading.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

35/100

The chemistry material is often described as difficult, and .

The online review notes some struggle, while and lecture-dependent.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

20/100

Students repeatedly warn that skipping class or not paying attention will hurt performance.

The only online review says participation matters, and and following lectures.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

36/100

Recommendations are split, but the strongest pattern is that students appreciate her kindness while warning about and .

The lone online review is positive, but the .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

46/100

Some reviews mention or grade help, but others report unclear, weird, or .

Format shift

, while in-person reviews contain both leniency and .

Workload

Heavy

28/100

Students frequently mention lots of , and extra practice outside class.

Format shift

The online review mentions struggle but not workload details, while .

Teaching experience

Poor

43/100

She is often described as kind and helpful, but many students say .

Format shift

Online feedback is mildly positive, while and often critical of lecture clarity.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

Grades , and a final rather than one dominant assessment type.

Format shift

Online evidence is sparse, while and exams.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

29 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person reviews are polarized, praising her kindness while , and self-teaching.

Main concern

Many students say and require major outside work.

What students said

“ ! You WILL teach yourself the whole way and will be drowned with homework and there is always something due.”
151
“The class is very difficult, but she tries to make it as easy as possible for her students.”
CHEM201

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

The single online and the class is manageable if students pay attention, but the student still struggled.

Main concern

Participation and attention appear important for passing.

What students said

“I will admit I struggled a bit with this class but it was more in part due to me than her.”
CHEM151

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mention tests and a final, but they do not clearly prove open-book rules, proctoring, webcam use, or Lockdown Browser.

Tests MentionedFinal MentionedNo Clear Proctoring Evidence

Assessment risk

Standard

45/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and a final, but exam rules are not clearly described.

Tests MentionedFinal Mentioned
“4 Tests, One final, a lot of classwork, labs.”
CHEM151

Online

The online review does not clearly describe exams, proctoring, webcam use, or open-book rules.

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ ! You WILL teach yourself the whole way and will be drowned with homework and there is always something due.”

Voice snapshots generated from 30 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and support; credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Clarity

43/100

“Her lectures are and she isn't very intresting at all!”

📚 Workload Pressure

28/100

“Prepare to do a LOT of work though.”

❤️ Helpfulness

60/100

“She is very helpful professor. You need to do extra practice outside class to get good grade.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Her lectures are and she isn't very intresting at all!
  • She is a nice teacher, but .
  • . :)

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • The class is very difficult, but she tries to make it as easy as possible for her students.
  • If you do all the homework and study guides you should easily pass the class, but beware this class requires a lot of work.
  • Claims in syllabus that 85-100 is an A, but the .

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • She is truly an amazing individual.
  • and she genuinely wants you to do well.
  • She has a very strong accent. if you ask for help.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

30

Recent reviews read by the AI

30

Lifetime ratings

88/100

Evidence confidence

Thirty reviews over many years provide strong volume and consistent themes, though older reviews dominate.

Inside 30 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 59
3 out of 57
2 out of 59
1 out of 55

Course coverage

CHEM15122 reviews
1514 reviews
CHEM2013 reviews
126171 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

9 reported outcomes

A range

2

A 2

B range

5

B+ 3 · B 2

C range

1

C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not sure yet 1