AI Rate Professor

Chemistry

Rebecca Eikey

CHEM151 · CHEM202 · FYE100 · CHEM201 · GENCHEM1 · 62 lifetime ratings

AI rating
57/100
RMP rating
3.7/5
Take again
56.25%
Difficulty
3.7

The decision

if you want to learn chemistry deeply and can , and fast pacing.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerCaring and passionateVery difficult examsHeavy workloadExtra credit availableFast-paced lectures
  • Students often praise her passion, kindness, office-hour help, and ability to make chemistry meaningful.
  • The course is repeatedly described as hard, fast, work-heavy, and .
  • Grades can be fair or boosted by , but many students say tests and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

42/100

A high grade is possible with effort, , and support, but , and workload make the A costly.

The one online review reports an A despite heavy work, while effort.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

28/100

Chemistry content is frequently called extremely difficult, fast-paced, and test-heavy, even by students who like her.

Both online and , with in-person evidence much stronger.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

25/100

Attendance appears important because lectures, labs, practice, and in-class support are central, and .

, while in-person comments include mandatory lectures and labs plus strong dependence on class practice.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

64/100

because she is caring and knowledgeable, but because tests and workload are intense.

The online review is strongly positive, while but lean positive for motivated chemistry students.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

34/100

and fairness appear in several reviews, but , and point deductions are common complaints.

Format shift

Online grading evidence is limited, while and .

Workload

Heavy

22/100

Reviews repeatedly mention labs, , and major study hours.

Format shift

The online review explicitly lists a loaded workload, and .

Teaching experience

Good

72/100

Most positive , and clear, but negative reviews cite rushed pacing and .

Format shift

Online feedback is very positive about support, while but often praises her teaching.

Assessment method

Balanced

62/100

Grades appear to combine tests with , and .

Format shift

Online evidence emphasizes assignments and labs, while as a major factor.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

49 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person reviews praise her caring teaching and chemistry passion but , and fast lectures.

Main concern

Tests, workload, and her teaching.

What students said

“ .”
CHEM202
“Getting an A is not impossible but she will make sure you earned it.”
CHEM201

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

The single online review praises her support and recorded lectures but says the course is loaded and fast-paced.

Main concern

The workload is heavy, with , and quizzes.

What students said

“A lot of work, youll definitely need to learn time management”
CHEM202

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews strongly support difficult and , but do not clearly prove open-book rules, webcam use, Lockdown Browser, or proctoring.

Difficult TestsTest HeavyTough ExamsNo Clear Proctoring Evidence

Assessment risk

Strict

32/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

as extremely difficult, tough, or test-heavy, but exam rules are not clearly specified.

Difficult TestsTest HeavyTough Exams
“ .”
CHEM202
“ .”
CHEM151

Online

The online review does not clearly describe exam format, proctoring, webcam use, Lockdown Browser, or open-book rules.

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Getting an A is not impossible but she will make sure you earned it.”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and support; credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

72/100

“She is so kind and caring and wants to help all her students as much as possible.”

📚 Workload Load

22/100

“A lot of work, youll definitely need to learn time management”

🧪

32/100

“She's the hardest tester in the chemistry department”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She is super passionate about chemistry.
  • but sometimes and fast too.
  • She lectures well, I didn't need the book at all to understand the material.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • This class is very hard but she makes you want to learn.
  • Getting an A is not impossible but she will make sure you earned it.
  • Worked my butt off all semester and still got a B.

Theme 3

📝

  • .
  • She gives a lot of work, it wont be an easy class.
  • quizzes

Theme 4

❤️ About Support

  • She is always willing to help her students so they can understand the material.
  • She was always open to questions, and gave a lot of EC
  • Whenever I did not understand how to solve a problem she went out of her way to show me how to do it.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

62

Lifetime ratings

93/100

Evidence confidence

Fifty reviews across many years provide strong volume, detail, and repeated themes despite polarized opinions.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 528
4 out of 513
3 out of 59
2 out of 57
1 out of 55

Course coverage

CHEM15123 reviews
CHEM20212 reviews
CHEM2019 reviews
FYE1003 reviews
1511 review
Show 2 more courses
2021 review
GENCHEM11 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

16 reported outcomes

A range

10

A+ 5 · A 5

B range

4

B+ 2 · B 2

C range

1

C+ 1

D range

1

D- 1

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values