AI Rate Professor

Mass Media

Frank Alli

MEA111 · 2 lifetime ratings

AI rating
10/100
RMP rating
1.0/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
4.0

The decision

unless you can handle weak organization, limited support, and demanding group-based media work.

Best fit · Self Taught ProDisorganizedGroup projectsTough graderUnsupportiveLecture heavy
  • Both reviews rate him at the lowest quality level and .
  • Students describe the class as , and group-project heavy.
  • The workload involves outside news stories and required group work with poor structure.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

28/100

There is no grade evidence for easy A outcomes, and , and poor support.

Only in-person evidence exists, and .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

30/100

The course seems challenging mainly because of outside news-story work, required groups, and poor organization.

Only in-person reviews exist, so the course difficulty .

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

Reviews do not clearly .

There are no online reviews, and in-person comments .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

5/100

Both students strongly reject the course because , and .

Only in-person evidence exists, and it is uniformly negative.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

25/100

The and negative comments suggest grading feels strict, though .

Format shift

as a tough grader.

Workload

Heavy

25/100

Students describe semester-long outside news stories and .

Format shift

Only in-person evidence exists, and .

Teaching experience

Awful

12/100

Students describe him as , and lecture-heavy.

Format shift

Only in-person evidence exists, and it is consistently very negative.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

15/100

Reviews emphasize projects, group work, and news stories rather than exams.

Format shift

Only in-person reviews exist, and neither mentions exams as a major assessment method.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person reviews are strongly negative, citing disorganization, poor support, group requirements, and difficult workload.

Main concern

Students report little support and poor course structure.

What students said

“ .”
MEA111
“He doesn't have an ”
MEA111
“Hard pass!”
MEA111

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove exam .

Exam Policy Not Clearly Proven

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, Lockdown Browser, open-book, quiz, midterm, or final policy.

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“This professor is the worst professor I have had at College of the Canyons thus far.”

Voice snapshots generated from 2 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching, organization, workload, and recommendation strength. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

12/100

“This professor is the worst professor I have had at College of the Canyons thus far.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

5/100

“Hard pass!”

📦 Workload Structure

25/100

“Whole semester youre making news stories outside of class.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • .
  • He also drones on during lectures.
  • He makes people that are doing better than him look bad

Theme 2

🧩 About Organization

  • He doesn't have an
  • nor did he implement a standard for how to operate in groups (required) during COVID-19.
  • he doesn't like to do emails and will ask you to call him instead.

Theme 3

📚 About Workload

  • Whole semester youre making news stories outside of class.
  • Group projects

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

2

Recent reviews read by the AI

2

Lifetime ratings

40/100

Evidence confidence

, but both are recent enough and strongly consistent in negative tone.

Inside 2 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 52

Course coverage

MEA1112 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values