AI Rate Professor

Economics

Tyler Prante

ECON170 · 3 lifetime ratings

AI rating
11/100
RMP rating
1.7/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
4.3

The decision

Avoid Tyler Prante unless you are ready to teach yourself heavily from the textbook and .

Best fit · Self Taught ProHard testsPoor lecturesTough graderUnclear guidanceHeavy reading
  • Students report , and limited guidance on what to study.
  • Tests and quizzes are described as difficult and poorly aligned with assigned texts.
  • All reviewers .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

28/100

An A may be possible, but students , and poor guidance, so the grade is not low-effort.

Online evidence is harsher about failing tests, while and weak lecture support.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

27/100

The course feels difficult because students while lectures and study guidance are weak.

Online reviews emphasize misaligned tests, while and .

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

Reviews do .

Neither online .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

5/100

because the course feels poorly supported, hard to study for, and frustrating.

Both formats are negative, with the online review ending in a dropped class and .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

18/100

Students describe tough grading and .

Format shift

The online review directly tags tough grading, while and low grade satisfaction.

Workload

Heavy

25/100

Students report and long study hours with little useful guidance.

Format shift

Online evidence stresses hours of studying, while and quiz pressure.

Teaching experience

Poor

20/100

Students describe low lecture audio, poor guidance, difficult communication, and scattered deadlines.

Format shift

Online evidence focuses on poor contact and test mismatch, while .

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

85/100

Reviews repeatedly mention quizzes and tests as the main source of difficulty.

Format shift

Online evidence centers on tests, while in-person evidence mentions quizzes with 48 questions in 48 minutes.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person students report low lecture , and fast quizzes.

Main concern

Lectures may be hard to use, forcing students to rely on the textbook.

What students said

“His lecture volume was so low you cannot get anything from them.”
ECON170
“No guidance on what you need to study for the my textbook.”
ECON170
“Also, you get around 48 questions to answer in 48 minutes.”
ECON170

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

The online review describes intense studying, failed tests, poor alignment with texts, and weak communication.

Main concern

Students may struggle to get help or .

What students said

“I spent hours on end intensely studying for because the .”
ECON170
“He was also very difficult to get in contact with if you had questions.”
ECON170

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews show difficult tests and timed quizzes, but do not clearly prove proctoring, webcam, open-book, or closed-book rules.

Difficult testsTimed quizzesExam policy not clearly proven

Assessment risk

Strict

25/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, but do not clearly prove closed-book rules or final exam structure.

Timed quizzes
“Also, you get around 48 questions to answer in 48 minutes.”
ECON170

Online

The online review reports difficult tests that did not match the assigned texts, but .

Difficult tests
“I spent hours on end intensely studying for because the .”
ECON170

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“I spent hours on end intensely studying for because the .”

Voice snapshots generated from 3 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and grading. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

20/100

“His lecture volume was so low you cannot get anything from them.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

5/100

“Professor Prante is not the first choice.”

⚖️ Assessment Pressure

25/100

“Also, you get around 48 questions to answer in 48 minutes.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • His lecture volume was so low you cannot get anything from them.
  • No guidance on what you need to study for the my textbook.
  • He was also very difficult to get in contact with if you had questions.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • I spent hours on end intensely studying for because the .
  • The amount of work you have to learn about The Great Depression, the New Deal, and the Roosevelt administration is ingrained into my head.
  • I have a 4.0 GPA, but this was the lowest grade I received on any of my classes.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

3

Recent reviews read by the AI

3

Lifetime ratings

55/100

Evidence confidence

, but they are consistent and , and assessment problems.

Inside 3 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 52
1 out of 51

Course coverage

ECON1703 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

1

B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values