AI Rate Professor

English

Kim Rawley

ENGLISH091 · ENGLISH101 · ENGL091 · ENG091 · ENGLISH103 · ENGLISH91 · ENGL103 · ENG102 · ENG101 · ENG103 · 25 lifetime ratings

AI rating
45/100
RMP rating
3.3/5
Take again
52.38%
Difficulty
2.4

The decision

if you can handle disorganization and writing-heavy work in exchange for , and possible grade boosts.

Best fit · Effort For RewardDisorganized deadlinesHelpful feedbackMany papersExtra creditMixed communication
  • , and vague assignment directions.
  • In-person reviews are more forgiving because many students mention , and a caring personality.
  • Online reviews are much harsher, with major complaints about communication and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

68/100

An A , and keeping up, but unclear directions and heavy writing raise the effort cost.

, while in-person evidence more often mentions rewrites and .

Is the course easy?

Beginner

63/100

The writing content is usually manageable, but vague prompts, reading, and itself.

In-person students often call the class easy to pass, while online students describe the coursework as unclear and frustrating.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

25/100

, and online participation is also mentioned.

online reviews only showing participation matters.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

45/100

and leniency, but many warn against taking her because of disorganization and communication problems.

, while in-person reviews are split between strong praise and strong warnings.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

58/100

, but rewrites, , and second chances make outcomes more forgiving for persistent students.

Format shift

Online students emphasize strict grading, while and .

Workload

Heavy

35/100

The course is writing-heavy, with many reviews mentioning long essays, papers, reading, and .

Format shift

Both formats mention many papers, but online students describe the workload as more stressful because .

Teaching experience

Average

48/100

She can be caring, funny, and helpful, but disorganization and vague communication seriously weaken the teaching experience.

Format shift

Online teaching reviews are strongly negative, while and often praise her personal support.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

20/100

Assessment appears centered , and occasional minor quizzes rather than exams.

Format shift

Both formats primarily describe papers and assignments rather than exams.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

21 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews are mixed, with frequent complaints about organization but many positive , and .

Main concern

The and deadlines in a paper-heavy class.

What students said

“Attendance is mandatory, and really helps because be used in the essays.”
ENGLISH101
“Easy class to pass.”
ENG103

Remote format

Online

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews are polarized but mostly negative, citing poor communication, vague directions, and .

Main concern

Students and changing deadlines without reliable communication.

What students said

“Huge lack of communication.”
ENGLISH103
“She is very vague in , and makes you feel stupid for asking questions.”
ENG103

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove a , and most assessment evidence centers on essays and papers.

Exam policy not clearly provenPaper-focused assessment

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, open-book, midterm, or final exam policies.

Paper-focused assessmentExam policy not clearly proven
“i've only written 2 papers, had 1 quiz, and had a small group presentation that was super easy!”
ENGL091

Online

Online reviews do not clearly prove webcam, proctoring, open-book, midterm, or .

Exam policy not clearly proven

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Although Professor Rawley can be unorganized at and fair in .”

Voice snapshots generated from 25 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching, organization, workload, and grading. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

48/100

“Even though .”

⚖️

58/100

“ and allowed us to peer review helping improve them.”

🚩 Online Risk

35/100

“Huge lack of communication.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Great Professor, funny and tells great stories.
  • in writing.
  • , but a very good teacher overall.

Theme 2

📚 About Workload

  • , but she does give you the opportunity to rewrite them for a better grade.
  • All essays are 8 pages long so be aware.
  • The if you read the books that she assigns.

Theme 3

📈 About Grades

  • In addition, she gives a lot of to boost your grade.
  • If you do poorly on the .
  • If you keep up with all the work it can be an easy A.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

25

Recent reviews read by the AI

25

Lifetime ratings

86/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is high because 25 reviews span multiple years and show , and grade flexibility.

Inside 25 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 58
4 out of 57
3 out of 52
2 out of 52
1 out of 56

Course coverage

ENG1038 reviews
ENGLISH1015 reviews
ENG1023 reviews
ENGL0912 reviews
ENGLISH912 reviews
Show 5 more courses
ENG0911 review
ENG1011 review
ENGL1031 review
ENGLISH0911 review
ENGLISH1031 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

19 reported outcomes

A range

10

A 10

B range

5

B+ 2 · B 3

C range

1

C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

3

Not sure yet 3