AI Rate Professor

Physics

Ola Nusierat

PHYSICS222 · PHYSC110 · PHYSICS110 · PHYS220 · PHYS222 · PHYS110 · PHYSIC110 · PHYSICS101 · 11 lifetime ratings

AI rating
10/100
RMP rating
1.9/5
Take again
16.67%
Difficulty
4.1

The decision

unless and tolerate heavy, test-focused work.

Best fit · Self Taught ProConfusing LecturesTough GraderHeavy HomeworkTest HeavyPoor Communication
  • Most students , and weak support.
  • The class can still produce A grades, but students often .
  • Online reviews are especially negative, while but remain mostly critical.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

30/100

A grades are possible, but comments show they , and careful exam preparation.

Online reviews say students must self-teach, while but with high effort and .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

28/100

Physics content , and fast or uneven coverage.

Online students blame poor teaching and Mastering Physics, while and labs.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

15/100

Several in-person reviews say skipping class hurts performance, and participation appears important.

In-person evidence supports strict attendance expectations, while online reviews .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

16/100

Most students advise avoiding her because they find the , and support weak.

, and most in-person reviews also discourage taking her despite two positive exceptions.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

18/100

Students repeatedly , and reluctance to give A grades.

Format shift

Online reviews call her a tough grader, while deductions and harsh lab grading.

Workload

Heavy

24/100

Workload is heavy because students mention , and major exams.

Format shift

Online workload centers on Mastering Physics and self-teaching, while , and exams.

Teaching experience

Awful

18/100

Most reviews describe her as confusing, unhelpful, poorly prepared, or difficult to communicate with.

Format shift

Online reviews are uniformly negative, while but are still mostly poor.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

86/100

Grades appear heavily exam-based, with , and Mastering Physics supporting the .

Format shift

Online reviews emphasize test-heavy Mastering Physics work, while , and test banks.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

10 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person reviews are mostly , and high exam pressure.

Main concern

Students , and harsh point deductions.

What students said

“She has a way of teaching things that .”
PHYSIC110
“Your going to have to teach yourself”
PHYSICS110
“ ”
PHYSICS101

Remote format

Online

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews are very negative, describing poor lectures, rude communication, Mastering Physics issues, and heavy self-teaching.

Main concern

Students say they had to learn from outside sources rather than from the course.

What students said

“AVOID.”
PHYS220
“prepare to learn everything from YouTube.”
PHYSICS222
“Terrible Lectures”
PHYSICS222

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams are high-risk and often criticized as difficult, rushed, or heavily weighted, with .

Test HeavyLimited Test TimeTwo Exams And FinalTest BanksPartial Credit

Assessment risk

Strict

24/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews describe difficult or , and partial credit, but do not clearly prove closed-book or .

Limited Test TimeTwo Exams And FinalTest BanksPartial Credit
“Doesn't give enough time for tests.”
PHYS222
“your main grade rests on 2 exams and the final.”
PHYSICS110
“On the ”
PHYSICS101

Online

Online reviews clearly describe test-heavy work but do not clearly .

Test HeavyMastering Physics
“AVOID. Her awful teaching combined with Mastering Physics”
PHYS220
“Test heavy”
PHYS220

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Your going to have to and rambles on.”

Voice snapshots generated from 12 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and communication. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

18/100

“Your going to have to and rambles on.”

⚖️

18/100

“she hates giving out As and and and tests.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

16/100

“ if you can!”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She has a way of teaching things that .
  • Terrible prerecorded lectures with .
  • Dr. Nusierat has good intentions, but she is terrible at articulating the material.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • This is not a easy class, get ready to study a lot.
  • The and nightly.
  • , but she did provide .

Theme 3

🧪 About Labs And Support

  • I struggled with the lab assignments because the .
  • She
  • Good luck with Labs because again, she doesnt seem prepared.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

12

Recent reviews read by the AI

11

Lifetime ratings

86/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is high because 12 reviews include detailed, consistent complaints across several years and formats, despite a few positive outliers.

Inside 12 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 52
1 out of 58

Course coverage

PHYSIC1103 reviews
PHYS1102 reviews
PHYSICS1102 reviews
PHYS2201 review
PHYS2221 review
Show 3 more courses
PHYSC1101 review
PHYSICS1011 review
PHYSICS2221 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

9 reported outcomes

A range

5

A+ 1 · A 3 · A- 1

B range

2

B 1 · B- 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

2

Drop/Withdrawal 1 · Not sure yet 1