AI Rate Professor

Political Science

Brian Goldberg

POLSCI150 · POLISCI150 · 2 lifetime ratings

AI rating
38/100
RMP rating
2.5/5
Take again
50%
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

if you can handle a risky online class with and inconsistent student experiences.

Best fit · Self Taught ProPolarizing online classHard testsExamples helpfulAttendance mattersMisaligned exams
  • Reviews are sharply split, with one student calling him helpful and another calling the class terrible.
  • The and and taught material.
  • The evidence base is very small, so the rating should be treated cautiously.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

42/100

One student earned an A, but and attendance risk make the A feel unreliable.

All evidence comes from online reviews, with .

Is the course easy?

Standard

45/100

The subject may be understandable through examples, but and difficulty make the course feel harder than the content alone.

Only online evidence exists, and and severe test complaints.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

18/100

The available tag says skipping class risks failing, so .

Only online evidence exists; there is .

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

45/100

Recommendation is split because one student found him nice and helpful while another strongly warned against the class.

Only online reviews exist, and they directly conflict.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

35/100

The single grade reported is an A, but hard, misaligned tests and a .

Format shift

Only online evidence exists, with .

Workload

Moderate

48/100

, but the and need to keep up with class make the course feel moderately demanding.

Format shift

Only online evidence exists, and .

Teaching experience

Poor

45/100

and a severe complaint about errors and misaligned assessments.

Format shift

Only online evidence exists, and it is highly polarized.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

85/100

The clearest , and , with tests driving the main risk.

Format shift

Only online evidence exists, and the strongest assessment comments are about tests.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Remote format

Online

2 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews conflict strongly, with one praising his examples and openness while and misaligned.

Main concern

and may not match what students feel they learned.

What students said

“ and likes to give a lot of examples”
POLSCI150
“The and do not align with what we learned.”
POLISCI150

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove proctoring or open-book rules, but the as very hard and poorly aligned.

Hard TestsMisaligned TestsNo Clear Proctoring EvidenceExtra Credit

Assessment risk

Strict

28/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Online

Online and errors, but do not clearly prove webcam, Lockdown Browser, open-book, or proctoring policy.

Hard TestsMisaligned TestsNo Clear Proctoring Evidence
“The and do not align with what we learned.”
POLISCI150
“numerous grammatical errors in .”
POLISCI150

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“The and do not align with what we learned.”

Voice snapshots generated from 2 reviews, highlighting the and . Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

45/100

“ and likes to give a lot of examples so that you can totally understand what the topic is.”

⚠️

28/100

“The and do not align with what we learned.”

👍 Recommendation Split

45/100

“ .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • and likes to give a lot of examples
  • He is always open to hearing questions during class.

Theme 2

📝 About Exams

  • The and do not align with what we learned.
  • numerous grammatical errors in .

Theme 3

⚖️ About Recommendation

  • I think he was a pretty good teacher.
  • Brian Goldberg's class is probably the .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

2

Recent reviews read by the AI

2

Lifetime ratings

38/100

Evidence confidence

Only 2 online reviews exist, and they strongly conflict, so conclusions are useful but unstable.

Inside 2 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

POLISCI1501 review
POLSCI1501 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values