AI Rate Professor

Chemistry

Grazyna Orzechowska

CHEM151 · CHEM201 · 12 lifetime ratings

AI rating
18/100
RMP rating
2.1/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
3.8

The decision

unless you are comfortable teaching yourself a difficult chemistry course and .

Best fit · Self Taught ProConfusing lecturesTough graderSelf-teaching requiredHeavy chemistry workloadLow recommendation
  • Most students say she knows chemistry but and .
  • A good grade is possible, but , and outside help.
  • Students report frustration, tough grading, hard quizzes or tests, and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

32/100

A good grade is possible, but comments , and pushing through hard tests and labs.

The online review says an A is possible with every assignment, while needing major self-teaching.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

25/100

Chemistry is already hard, and students say and poor explanations make the content harder than necessary.

Both formats describe a hard course, but increases the difficulty.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

18/100

Students repeatedly warn not to miss class or lab, and the online review says late or .

The online review gives the , while and comments also say skipping class risks failure.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

12/100

Students mostly do not recommend her because they find the , and support frustrating.

The online review is cautious but not enthusiastic, while .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

18/100

Reviews repeatedly mention tough grading, zeros for , and .

Format shift

Online evidence flags late lab penalties, while and hard quizzes or tests.

Workload

Heavy

24/100

Students report lots of , and significant self-study outside class.

Format shift

Online evidence mentions labs and assignments, while and outside help.

Teaching experience

Poor

24/100

Students often say she understands chemistry but as confusing, and gets frustrated with questions.

Format shift

The online review is moderate, but and help.

Assessment method

Balanced

58/100

, and tests, with tests and quizzes described as hard.

Format shift

Online evidence mentions homework and labs, while and tests.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

11 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person reviews are mostly negative, emphasizing , poor explanations, frustration with questions, and .

Main concern

because and help can feel frustrating.

What students said

“ ”
CHEM151
“ and spend a lot of time on the TLC”
CHEM151

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

The single online review says the class is , and possible to pass only with steady work.

Main concern

and heavy independent effort make the online evidence risky.

What students said

“Hard subject, hard class.”
CHEM201
“DO NOT show up late for lab”
CHEM201

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews describe difficult quizzes and tests, but they do not clearly prove proctoring, Lockdown Browser, open-book, or closed-book policies.

Hard TestsHard QuizzesPop QuizzesFinal Break

Assessment risk

Standard

42/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and a final grade break, but do not clearly prove closed-book or proctoring rules.

Hard TestsHard QuizzesPop QuizzesFinal Break
“Quizzes and .”
CHEM201
“Gives a huge break with final.”
CHEM151

Online

The online review does not clearly prove online exam format, proctoring, .

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Nice lady, Bad teacher”

Voice snapshots generated from 12 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and support. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

24/100

“She understood the material but did a horrible job of explaining it.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

12/100

“If you can, get another class guys, seriously.”

⚖️

18/100

“If she even suspects you're copying from another student she'll give you a zero”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She was terrible at teaching material and Has a very heavy accent.
  • Horrible at explaining.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • Hard subject, hard class.
  • Quizzes and .
  • I worked my ass off in her class an barely passed.

Theme 3

⚠️ About Student Support

  • she gets upset with students when we don't understand concepts
  • she never answers the question that was asked.
  • and spend a lot of time on the TLC

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

12

Recent reviews read by the AI

12

Lifetime ratings

72/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is medium because 12 reviews span several years and are consistent, but some are old and several lack detailed grade data.

Inside 12 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 53
2 out of 54
1 out of 54

Course coverage

CHEM1519 reviews
CHEM2013 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

7 reported outcomes

A range

3

A 3

B range

2

B 2

C range

2

C 2

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values